News

Supreme Court Allows Trump To Divert $2.5 Billion In Pentagon Funds For Border Wall Construction

On Friday, the Supreme Court voted 5-4 to permit President Donald Trump to use $2.5 billion in Pentagon funds for construction of his southern border wall.

The Supreme Court said the groups that challenged the Trump administration did not seem to have a legal right to do so.

One of the court’s left-leaning judges, Justice Stephen Breyer, wrote in his dissent that he would have permitted the White House to seek preparatory work instead of construction.

SLIDESHOW: TOP DEMOCRATS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2020

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

The high court’s ruling came on the same day Trump reached a deal with Guatemala meant to reduce the influx of Central American migrants looking for refuge in the United States. Under the pact, migrants would be forced to seek asylum in Guatemala before reaching the U.S.

The case surrounding the border wall involved injunctions that halted the transfer of military funds for the barrier’s construction.

Breyer also reportedly noted in his dissent that the White House could lose access to the funds for the border wall if if failed to finalize contracts by the end of September.

Trump declared a national emergency along the border with Mexico in February. This came after a two-month dispute with Congress — that included a record-breaking partial government shutdown — over funding for the barrier. The president has long railed against what he perceives are large numbers of illegal immigrants bringing drugs and other crime across the southern border.

“The case is not about whether the challenged border barrier construction plan is wise or unwise. It is not about whether the plan is the right or wrong policy response to existing conditions at the southern border of the United States,” Judge Haywood Gilliam Jr. of the U.S. District Court in Oakland, California wrote in his decisions. “Instead, this case presents strict legal questions regarding whether the proposed plan for funding border barrier construction exceeds the executive branch’s lawful authority.”

Two advocacy groups represented by the American Civil Liberties Union — the Southern Border Communities Coalition and the Sierra Club — reportedly filed a lawsuit to halt Trump’s plan to use defense funds for the border wall’s construction in order to curb drug trafficking.

Pablo Mena

Writer for upolitics.com. NY Giants and Rangers fan. Film and TV enthusiast (especially Harry Potter and The Office) and lover of foreign languages and cultures.

Recent Posts

Federal Trade Commission Votes To Ban Noncompete Agreements

On Tuesday, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) banned noncompete agreements in a 3-2 vote. The…

2 days ago

California Bill Would Prevent CLEAR Passengers From Line-Jumping At Airports

A proposed bill in California would prohibit security screening company CLEAR from skipping the general…

3 days ago

Supreme Court Seems Receptive To Laws That Allow Restrictions On Homeless

On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments over a challenge to a law allowing…

4 days ago

Arizona Republicans Block Bill To Repeal Abortion Ban On State House Floor

The Arizona House of Representatives failed to advance a repeal of the state's 160-year-old abortion…

5 days ago

After Oregon Recriminalizes Drug Possession, What’s Next For The State’s Drug Policy

Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek (D) signed a bill restoring criminal charges in cases of hard drug possession.…

1 week ago

Biden’s New Regulation Will Limit Toxic Chemicals In Drinking Water Across The Country

President Joe Biden's administration announced the first-ever national limits on toxic "forever chemicals" in drinking water. This…

1 week ago