News

Supreme Court Allows Trump To Divert $2.5 Billion In Pentagon Funds For Border Wall Construction

On Friday, the Supreme Court voted 5-4 to permit President Donald Trump to use $2.5 billion in Pentagon funds for construction of his southern border wall.

The Supreme Court said the groups that challenged the Trump administration did not seem to have a legal right to do so.

One of the court’s left-leaning judges, Justice Stephen Breyer, wrote in his dissent that he would have permitted the White House to seek preparatory work instead of construction.

SLIDESHOW: TOP DEMOCRATS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2020

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

The high court’s ruling came on the same day Trump reached a deal with Guatemala meant to reduce the influx of Central American migrants looking for refuge in the United States. Under the pact, migrants would be forced to seek asylum in Guatemala before reaching the U.S.

The case surrounding the border wall involved injunctions that halted the transfer of military funds for the barrier’s construction.

Breyer also reportedly noted in his dissent that the White House could lose access to the funds for the border wall if if failed to finalize contracts by the end of September.

Trump declared a national emergency along the border with Mexico in February. This came after a two-month dispute with Congress — that included a record-breaking partial government shutdown — over funding for the barrier. The president has long railed against what he perceives are large numbers of illegal immigrants bringing drugs and other crime across the southern border.

“The case is not about whether the challenged border barrier construction plan is wise or unwise. It is not about whether the plan is the right or wrong policy response to existing conditions at the southern border of the United States,” Judge Haywood Gilliam Jr. of the U.S. District Court in Oakland, California wrote in his decisions. “Instead, this case presents strict legal questions regarding whether the proposed plan for funding border barrier construction exceeds the executive branch’s lawful authority.”

Two advocacy groups represented by the American Civil Liberties Union — the Southern Border Communities Coalition and the Sierra Club — reportedly filed a lawsuit to halt Trump’s plan to use defense funds for the border wall’s construction in order to curb drug trafficking.

Pablo Mena

Writer for upolitics.com. NY Giants and Rangers fan. Film and TV enthusiast (especially Harry Potter and The Office) and lover of foreign languages and cultures.

Share
Published by
Pablo Mena

Recent Posts

Supreme Court Allows States To Defund Planned Parenthood

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of South Carolina's decision to stop covering Planned Parenthood's…

3 hours ago

Judge Blocks Trump Order Eliminating Union Bargaining For Federal Government Workers

A federal judge ruled on June 24 that the Trump administration cannot eliminate union bargaining…

4 hours ago

Tulsa Mayor Monroe Nichols Announces $105M Fund To Address Legacy Of 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre, Avoids Talk Of ‘Reparations’

Earlier this month, Tulsa Mayor Monroe Nichols unveiled a $105 million city-backed plan aimed at…

5 hours ago

128 House Democrats Join All Republicans To Shut Down Trump Impeachment Effort By Rep. Al Green

A majority of Democrats joined Republicans in the House of Representatives to crush the bid…

10 hours ago

GOP Rep. Andy Ogles Calls For NYC Mayoral Nominee Zohran Mamdani To Be ‘Deported & Denaturalized,’ Democrats Call It ‘Racist Drivel’

Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tennessee) said that New York City Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani should…

11 hours ago

Trump Administration Eliminates Biden Policy Requiring Hospitals To Provide Emergency Abortions

On Tuesday, the Trump administration rescinded health guidance that the Biden administration established in 2022.…

1 day ago