News

North Carolina Election Officials Find Illegal Absentee Ballot ‘Scheme’ In Midterms House Race

A North Carolina election official claimed Monday at a hearing that a political operative working for a Republican congressional candidate attempted to conceal an illicit absentee ballot “scheme” for a House race during November’s midterm elections.

Kim Strach, the executive director of North Carolina’s State Board of Elections, revealed investigators’ conclusions at a hearing in Raleigh. Strach spoke of a “coordinated, unlawful and substantially resourced” voter fraud plot. The race in question is the Ninth Congressional District election between GOP candidate Mark Harris and Democratic challenger Dan McCreadythe final undecided House race that was deemed too close to call in November. Harris currently holds a 905-vote lead over McCready. That seat in North Carolina has been under GOP control for more than 50 years, so McCready’s victory would be monumental. Last year, election officials refused to confirm Harris as the winner of the race due to concerns over the voting process, specifically with “irregularities” in absentee ballots.

SLIDESHOW: TOP DEMOCRATS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2020

Strach and witnesses stated the voter fraud operation in North Carolina included forging signatures, finishing ballots and mailing them from post offices near certain voters’ homes. At least 1,000 absentee ballots or request forms were allegedly destroyed in the scheme.

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

Strach also said the man who orchestrated the plot was L. McCrae Dowless Jr., a veteran political operative who served as a contractor for Harris’s campaign. Strach added she had thus far found no evidence that Harris himself played any role in the scheme.

Dowless was summoned to testify at Monday’s hearing but declined to attend.

“I don’t think he’s going to incriminate himself because I don’t think he’s done anything wrong, but I am just telling you, it’s just not a good situation from an attorney’s standpoint to let somebody testify in a situation like that,” Cynthia Singletary, Mr. Dowless’s attorney, said following the hearing.

As part of North Carolina’s election board’s investigation, 142 voters were interviewed and 30 or more subjects and witnesses were also interviewed.

Pablo Mena

Writer for upolitics.com. NY Giants and Rangers fan. Film and TV enthusiast (especially Harry Potter and The Office) and lover of foreign languages and cultures.

Recent Posts

Federal Trade Commission Votes To Ban Noncompete Agreements

On Tuesday, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) banned noncompete agreements in a 3-2 vote. The…

2 days ago

California Bill Would Prevent CLEAR Passengers From Line-Jumping At Airports

A proposed bill in California would prohibit security screening company CLEAR from skipping the general…

3 days ago

Supreme Court Seems Receptive To Laws That Allow Restrictions On Homeless

On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments over a challenge to a law allowing…

4 days ago

Arizona Republicans Block Bill To Repeal Abortion Ban On State House Floor

The Arizona House of Representatives failed to advance a repeal of the state's 160-year-old abortion…

5 days ago

After Oregon Recriminalizes Drug Possession, What’s Next For The State’s Drug Policy

Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek (D) signed a bill restoring criminal charges in cases of hard drug possession.…

1 week ago

Biden’s New Regulation Will Limit Toxic Chemicals In Drinking Water Across The Country

President Joe Biden's administration announced the first-ever national limits on toxic "forever chemicals" in drinking water. This…

1 week ago