News

Republican Senators Coalesce Around Plan For No Witnesses At Trump’s Senate Impeachment Trial

As the structure and rules of the trial in the Senate are being debated following the impeachment of President Donald Trump, there seems to be a broad consensus emerging among the Senate Republicans about having a short process in the Senate.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R–South Carolina) said that the Senate would decide, based chiefly on the report prepared by the House of Representatives. It would not go into a fresh examination of witnesses.

Sen. Ron Johnson (R–Wisconsin) said, “I would think the consensus would be let the House make their case, let the Senate make their case and then put forward a motion to vote.”

SLIDESHOW: TOP DEMOCRATS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2020

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

This reflects a seismic shift in the views of the Senate Republicans. The earlier view of most of the Republican Senators was that there should be an elaborate process in the Senate.

The earlier view was that witnesses should be called in to either depose them behind closed doors or testify in public. The witnesses would include Hunter Biden and the whistleblower.

The White House wants an elaborate process in the Senate.

The argument put forward by Republican senators in favor of the short process in the Senate is two-fold.

First, while the president’s desire to have witnesses, who could provide exculpatory evidence in his favor, is clearly understandable, but Republican Senate thinks having witnesses could work both ways.

If Republicans get their witnesses, the Democrats would try to get their witnesses too, like Vice President Mike Pence and others.

It is public knowledge that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R–Kentucky) has rebuffed Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer’s (D – New York) demand to have acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney, former National Security Adviser John Bolton and a few others testify in the Senate.

Second, subpoenaing new witnesses to depose or testify would delay the process. It would make it messy, with lots of motions and counter motions. It is something that voters would not like to see. Such a messy process might even reveal intraparty differences of opinion.

According to McConnell, this would be just going through the motions, knowing it is inconceivable that two-thirds of the Senate or 67 Senators would actually vote for impeachment.

Trump has called for a Senate hearing that publicly hears out witnesses, who would vindicate him and also one where Hunter Biden and the whistleblower would testify.

Rajeet Guha

Recent Posts

Federal Trade Commission Votes To Ban Noncompete Agreements

On Tuesday, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) banned noncompete agreements in a 3-2 vote. The…

2 days ago

California Bill Would Prevent CLEAR Passengers From Line-Jumping At Airports

A proposed bill in California would prohibit security screening company CLEAR from skipping the general…

3 days ago

Supreme Court Seems Receptive To Laws That Allow Restrictions On Homeless

On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments over a challenge to a law allowing…

4 days ago

Arizona Republicans Block Bill To Repeal Abortion Ban On State House Floor

The Arizona House of Representatives failed to advance a repeal of the state's 160-year-old abortion…

5 days ago

After Oregon Recriminalizes Drug Possession, What’s Next For The State’s Drug Policy

Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek (D) signed a bill restoring criminal charges in cases of hard drug possession.…

1 week ago

Biden’s New Regulation Will Limit Toxic Chemicals In Drinking Water Across The Country

President Joe Biden's administration announced the first-ever national limits on toxic "forever chemicals" in drinking water. This…

1 week ago