News

Federal Judge Suspends Release Of Instructions On How To 3D-Print A Gun

In a time crunch, a federal judge temporarily blocked a settlement that would have allowed nonprofit organization Defense Distributed to release downloadable blueprints on how to make a 3D printed gun.

The suit was filed by the attorneys general of eight states who claim the blueprints would pose a serious threat to public safety. This comes just months after President Donald Trump‘s administration had already lifted the Obama-era ban on the release of such information. According to the settlement, the Trump administration conceded and the organization was allowed to release its blueprints starting in August.

Just hours before the documents were set to be released, Judge Robert Lasnik of the United States District Court reversed the decision. He issued a restraining order Tuesday night, ruling that there would be “no posting of instructions of how to produce 3D guns on the internet” on the grounds that such information posed “a likelihood of irreparable harm.”

 

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

Gun control activists argue that the release of such information would allow anyone with a 3D printer to bypass federal background checks by simply printing their own gun at home. They also argue that these untraceable homemade guns would allow criminals and terrorists to evade detection.

“3D printed guns are functional weapons that are often unrecognizable by standard metal detectors because they are made out of materials other than metal (e.g., plastic) and untraceable because they contain no serial numbers,” state officials said in the lawsuit. “Anyone with access to the CAD files and a commercially available 3D printer could readily manufacture, possess or sell such a weapon.”

SLIDESHOW: DONALD TRUMP’S 30 CRAZIEST TWEETS

Defense Distributed founder and self-proclaimed anarchist Cody Wilson has since filed a countersuit, alleging that the ban is a violation of his First Amendment rights. “We were disappointed in the ruling and view it as a massive prior restraint of free speech,” said Wilson’s legal defense.

Judge Lasnik also acknowledged that there were “serious First Amendment issues” that still had to be worked out in court. A follow-up hearing is scheduled for August 10 to determine whether the order should be made permanent.

Like
Like Love Haha Wow Sad Angry
Cathryn Casatuta

Recent Posts

After Trump Refers To Himself & Netanyahu As ‘War Heroes,’ Former GOP Rep. Adam Kinzinger Says Comment ‘Is Nuts’

On Tuesday, President Donald Trump referred to himself as a “war hero” for authorizing airstrikes…

19 mins ago

Federal Agents Raid D.C. Homeless Encampments Amid Trump Administration’s Takeover

Federal agents conducted a series of raids on homeless encampments across Washington, D.C., as part…

6 hours ago

Ex-South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol Avoids Questioning By Laying Jail Cell Floor In Underwear

South Korea's Yoon Suk Yeol was removed from his office in April after an attempt…

14 hours ago

Trump Says U.S. Would ‘Support’ Security Force For Ukraine But Won’t Provide Troops

On Tuesday, President Donald Trump said he would not send U.S. troops to Ukraine, following…

15 hours ago

Trump Ally Rep. Elise Stefanik Booed Off Stage At Speech In Her Deep-Red District: ‘Unseal Epstein Files’

On Tuesday, Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-New York) was booed off the stage during an event…

19 hours ago

DNI Tulsi Gabbard Revokes Security Clearances For 37 Obama-Era Intelligence Officials

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard revoked the security clearances of 37 former intelligence officials…

20 hours ago