News

Federal Judge Suspends Release Of Instructions On How To 3D-Print A Gun

In a time crunch, a federal judge temporarily blocked a settlement that would have allowed nonprofit organization Defense Distributed to release downloadable blueprints on how to make a 3D printed gun.

The suit was filed by the attorneys general of eight states who claim the blueprints would pose a serious threat to public safety. This comes just months after President Donald Trump‘s administration had already lifted the Obama-era ban on the release of such information. According to the settlement, the Trump administration conceded and the organization was allowed to release its blueprints starting in August.

Just hours before the documents were set to be released, Judge Robert Lasnik of the United States District Court reversed the decision. He issued a restraining order Tuesday night, ruling that there would be “no posting of instructions of how to produce 3D guns on the internet” on the grounds that such information posed “a likelihood of irreparable harm.”

 

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

Gun control activists argue that the release of such information would allow anyone with a 3D printer to bypass federal background checks by simply printing their own gun at home. They also argue that these untraceable homemade guns would allow criminals and terrorists to evade detection.

“3D printed guns are functional weapons that are often unrecognizable by standard metal detectors because they are made out of materials other than metal (e.g., plastic) and untraceable because they contain no serial numbers,” state officials said in the lawsuit. “Anyone with access to the CAD files and a commercially available 3D printer could readily manufacture, possess or sell such a weapon.”

SLIDESHOW: DONALD TRUMP’S 30 CRAZIEST TWEETS

Defense Distributed founder and self-proclaimed anarchist Cody Wilson has since filed a countersuit, alleging that the ban is a violation of his First Amendment rights. “We were disappointed in the ruling and view it as a massive prior restraint of free speech,” said Wilson’s legal defense.

Judge Lasnik also acknowledged that there were “serious First Amendment issues” that still had to be worked out in court. A follow-up hearing is scheduled for August 10 to determine whether the order should be made permanent.

Cathryn Casatuta

Recent Posts

VIDEO: GOP Rep. Victoria Spartz Drowned Out By Boos At Town Hall Meeting

https://youtu.be/bi1yuRyy2To Rep. Victoria Spartz (D-Indiana) was drowned out by boos at a town hall meeting…

2 hours ago

Ex-Democratic Rep. Cori Bush’s Husband Charged With Fraud For Allegedly Filing False Applications For $20,000 In Covid-Relief Funds

Former Rep. Cori Bush's (D-Missouri) husband has been charged with two counts of wire fraud…

8 hours ago

Minnesota Sen. Justin Eichorn, Who Wrote Bill To Make ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome’ An Illness, Charged With Soliciting Minor, Wife Files For Divorce

Minnesota state Sen. Justin Eichorn (R) has resigned from his position after he was federally…

1 day ago

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick’s Promotion Of Tesla Stock On TV Raises Serious Ethics Concerns

Legal experts have claimed that Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick's promotion of Tesla stocks raises significant…

1 day ago

GOP Rep. Andy Ogles Pushes Constitutional Amendment To Allow 3rd Term For Trump – But Not For Obama, Clinton Or Bush

Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tennessee) has proposed an amendment to the U.S. Constitution to allow presidents to serve…

2 days ago

Norwegian Oil Company Halts Supply To US Navy To Protest Trump’s Treatment Of Ukraine

Following the clash between President Donald Trump and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky at an Oval…

2 days ago