News

Donald Trump Calls Amazon “Stupid,” Says U.S. Postal Service Is Online Retailer’s “Delivery Boy”

Donald Trump assailed Amazon on Twitter on Tuesday, calling the online retail company “stupid” and accusing it of taking advantage of the U.S. Postal Service.

Donald Trump Amazon Criticism News

Amazon — a wildly successful multi-billion-dollar company — is just one of several giant firms the president has criticized for their business dealings. Trump once said Verizon made “a STUPID deal” for AOL. He also called Coca-Cola “garbage,” though he continues to consume it, and claimed Sony had “really stupid leadership.” He also called top executives at financial company S&P Global “losers.”

SLIDESHOW: DONALD TRUMP’S 30 CRAZIEST TWEETS

These types of comments — along with the administration’s imposition of tariffs on imports coming from China, which have instigated a trade war with the nation he has accused of dumping and currency manipulation — have caused stock markets to plunge in recent weeks. The Dow Jones has dropped more than 600 points, a record, several times, and many other indices have also plummeted.

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

Trump also said Amazon has long, repeatedly cost the U.S. Post Office amounts of money by using it as their “Delivery Boy.” Several economic experts have refuted this claim and reportedly informed the president that he is wrong, although he remains steadfast in his belief on the issue. Experts have stated that the Postal Service does in fact make money from Amazon.

Amazon’s stock price fell significantly this week, with shares dropping as low as $1,355.33. However, they rebounded and closed up 1.5 percent after Trump’s threat of antitrust action against the firm.

Trump’s comment in November that the $85.4 billion merger of AT&T and Time Warner would not be “good for the country” muddied the ongoing antitrust dispute between the two companies and the government.

Several major company executives have explained the impact of Trump’s tweets on businesses.

“This is an unprecedented situation for companies. The president’s tweets can cause significant reputational harm,” Dean C. Garfield, the president of the Information Technology Industry Council, which represents big technology companies like Amazon, Dell, Facebook, Google and IBM, told the New York Times. “We are now at a place where about 90 percent of the companies we represent now have a presidential Twitter strategy in place.”

Other people are less concerned that Trump’s feud with these firms will last long.

Trump attacked the NFL several times last year after players began protesting the national anthem by kneeling or sitting to make a statement about racial inequality and police brutality.

Some of Trump’s allies seem to believe the president is partially upset with Amazon because of its connection to The Washington Post, whose owner Jeff Bezos founded the e-commerce giant. The Post has also openly criticized Trump and his administration’s policies.

Similarly, Trump’s remarks on the AT&T-Time Warner deal could be tainted by his disdain for CNN — a subsidiary of Time Warner whom he has repeatedly attacked as “fake news.”

Trump is not the first U.S. president to criticize big businesses, though other president’s comments have been substantially more measured and informed.

Barack Obama once called out Staples for failing to provide more health care for its workers. “Shame on them,” he said.

After the recession in 2009, Obama also criticized several major Wall Street and other financial institutions for using federal bailout money to hand out large bonuses to their executives.

“That is the height of irresponsibility,” Obama stated without naming any firms. “It is shameful.”

Under Clinton, the Justice Department strived to break up Microsoft after it was revealed the company was taking advantage of its monopoly power to dominate the Internet.

Pharmaceutical giant Merck’s CEO Kenneth C. Frazier resigned from a presidential business council last year after stating his opposition to several White House policy positions, notably Trump’s statements after the white supremacist rallies in Charlottesville, Virginia.

The council eventually disbanded after several discussions during which some members were reportedly hesitant to defend Frazier out of fear of being verbally lambasted by Trump.

Pablo Mena

Writer for upolitics.com. NY Giants and Rangers fan. Film and TV enthusiast (especially Harry Potter and The Office) and lover of foreign languages and cultures.

Recent Posts

Federal Trade Commission Votes To Ban Noncompete Agreements

On Tuesday, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) banned noncompete agreements in a 3-2 vote. The…

3 days ago

California Bill Would Prevent CLEAR Passengers From Line-Jumping At Airports

A proposed bill in California would prohibit security screening company CLEAR from skipping the general…

4 days ago

Supreme Court Seems Receptive To Laws That Allow Restrictions On Homeless

On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments over a challenge to a law allowing…

5 days ago

Arizona Republicans Block Bill To Repeal Abortion Ban On State House Floor

The Arizona House of Representatives failed to advance a repeal of the state's 160-year-old abortion…

6 days ago

After Oregon Recriminalizes Drug Possession, What’s Next For The State’s Drug Policy

Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek (D) signed a bill restoring criminal charges in cases of hard drug possession.…

1 week ago

Biden’s New Regulation Will Limit Toxic Chemicals In Drinking Water Across The Country

President Joe Biden's administration announced the first-ever national limits on toxic "forever chemicals" in drinking water. This…

2 weeks ago