News

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts Slams Donald Trump: “We Do Not Have ‘Obama Judges’!”

Donald Trump has been critical of judges who issue rulings counter to his administration’s policies, but Chief Justice John Roberts has avoided directly contesting the sitting president. Roberts finally broke his silence on Tuesday, rebuking Trump’s claim that “an Obama judge” unfairly blocked one of his latest policies.

CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS DEFENDS HIS JUDGES, REFUTES TRUMP

Trump and his administration planned to deny asylum to immigrants who crossed over the border illegally, an act that was temporarily blocked in a ruling by Federal District Court Judge Jon Tigar on Monday. Trump harshly responded to the ruling on Tuesday before leaving the White House to go on holiday.

“You go the 9th Circuit and it’s a disgrace,” Trump exclaimed. “And I’m going to put in a major complaint because you cannot win, if you’re us, a case in the 9th Circuit and I think it’s a disgrace. This was an Obama judge. And I’ll tell you what, it’s not going to happen like this anymore.”

SLIDESHOW: DONALD TRUMP’S 30 CRAZIEST TWEETS

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

Although Barack Obama did nominate Tigar, Roberts rebutted Trump’s recent lamentations in an interview with the Associated Press on Wednesday. “We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges,” Roberts explained. “What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them,” adding that an “independent judiciary is something we should all be thankful for.”

This is the first instance of Roberts, who was appointed by George W. Bush, speaking out against Trump. However, Roberts has consistently maintained that the judges do not issue their rulings by adhering to partisan political ideologies. During a speech last month, Roberts said, “I will not criticize the political branches. Our role is very clear. We are to interpret the Constitution and laws of the United States and ensure that the political branches act within them.”

Matt Reisine

A writer for uPolitics with an array of interests.

Recent Posts

Federal Trade Commission Votes To Ban Noncompete Agreements

On Tuesday, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) banned noncompete agreements in a 3-2 vote. The…

2 days ago

California Bill Would Prevent CLEAR Passengers From Line-Jumping At Airports

A proposed bill in California would prohibit security screening company CLEAR from skipping the general…

3 days ago

Supreme Court Seems Receptive To Laws That Allow Restrictions On Homeless

On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments over a challenge to a law allowing…

4 days ago

Arizona Republicans Block Bill To Repeal Abortion Ban On State House Floor

The Arizona House of Representatives failed to advance a repeal of the state's 160-year-old abortion…

5 days ago

After Oregon Recriminalizes Drug Possession, What’s Next For The State’s Drug Policy

Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek (D) signed a bill restoring criminal charges in cases of hard drug possession.…

1 week ago

Biden’s New Regulation Will Limit Toxic Chemicals In Drinking Water Across The Country

President Joe Biden's administration announced the first-ever national limits on toxic "forever chemicals" in drinking water. This…

1 week ago