News

Trump & White House Will Not Participate In First Judiciary Impeachment Hearing

President Donald Trump and his attorneys have chosen not to participate in the House Judiciary Committee’s impeachment hearing Wednesday, calling the inquiry “baseless and highly partisan.”

In a five-page letter addressed to House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-New York), White House counsel to the President Pat Cipollone wrote, “We cannot fairly be expected to participate in a hearing while the witnesses are yet to be named and while it remains unclear whether the Judiciary Committee will afford the President a fair process through additional hearings.”


Cipollone said that he heard from “rumors and press reports” that the Dec. 4 hearing will consist of an academic discussion, and added that “[w]e understand this to mean that your initial hearing will
include no fact witnesses at all.”

“Inviting the Administration now to participate in an after-the-fact constitutional law
seminar-with yet-to-be-named witnesses-only demonstrates further the countless procedural
deficiencies that have infected this inquiry from its inception and shows the lack of seriousness
with which you are undertaking these proceedings,” Cipollone wrote, critiquing both the ongoing inquiry and the idea of holding an academic panel. “An academic discussion cannot retroactively
fix an irretrievably broken process.”

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

He also accused Nadler of “no doubt purposely” scheduling the hearing while Trump will be at a NATO meeting in London.

SLIDESHOW: TOP DEMOCRATS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2020

However, he emphasized that this letter was only in response to the Dec. 4 and wrote that Trump would be willing to participate in future hearings if the Judiciary Committee becomes “serious about conducting a fair process.”

“It is too late to cure the profound procedural deficiencies that have tainted this entire
inquiry,” Cipollone wrote. “Nevertheless, if you are serious about conducting a fair process going forward, and in order to protect the rights and privileges of the President, we may consider participating in future Judiciary Committee proceedings if you afford the Administration the ability to do so meaningfully.”

Katherine Huggins

Recent Posts

UK’s Supreme Court Rules ‘Woman’ Refers to Biological Sex, Says Transgender People Still Protected In Law

https://youtu.be/q7zqZz25gVk The UK’s Supreme Court has ruled that “the definition of the terms ‘woman’ and…

12 hours ago

Judge Boasberg Says He’s Ready Launch Contempt Proceedings Against Trump Administration For Defying Order Barring Deportations

Chief U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg stated that he is ready to launch contempt…

12 hours ago

Transgender Activist Marcy Rheintgen Arrested In Florida After Attempting To Use Women’s Restroom

Marcy Rheintgen, a 20-year-old transgender woman, was arrested at the Florida State Capitol building after…

1 day ago

Biden Slams Trump For Cuts To Social Security In First Post-Election Speech: ‘So Much Damage & Destruction’

Former President Joe Biden is slamming the Trump Administration for gutting the Social Security Administration.…

2 days ago

Colorado Passes Trailblazing Law Banning Guns With Detachable Magazines

Colorado has enacted a trailblazing gun-control law that bans the sale of firearms equipped with…

2 days ago

El Salvador President Nayib Bukele Calls Returning Deported Man Back To U.S. ‘Preposterous’ Despite Supreme Court Order

On Monday, during an Oval Office meeting, El Salvador President Nayib Bukele said it was…

2 days ago