News

Trump Administration Wants Authority Detain Migrant Families Longer Than 20 Days

After battling the courts, the Trump Administration is now attempting to bypass the judicial system in an attempt at detaining migrant families for longer periods of time than is currently legal.

Since 1997, the Flores Settlement Agreement has safeguarded migrant families from long-term detainment by restricting authorities from holding migrant children for more than 20 days. At this point, the consent decree requires that the children be released, typically with their families, until their cases are settled in immigration court.

The Trump administration is now attempting to pass an order that requires migrant children and families to be detained until their court cases are settled, a process which can take up to several months. According to Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen, the goal of rule is to address “one of the the primary pull factors for illegal immigration.” This “legal loophole,” argues the administration, is that migrants purposely bring their children to the border to avoid longer periods of detention. Many immigration advocates have since decried the argument as insensitive and deeply troubling.

 

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

“Efforts to weaken or eliminate basic child protection standards by calling them a burden or loopholes, and eliminating their obligations for the basic care of children, is just another example of the administration’s abdication of human rights,” said Michelle Brané, director of the migrant rights and justice program at the Women’s Refugee Commission.

In order to accommodate the extended holdings of these families, the government has proposed building a greater network of licensed facilities. But it has not yet given details as to the operation of these facilities.

The regulation was proposed last Thursday and is set to take effect 60 days from then, but is expected to be challenged in the courts before that point. 

Cathryn Casatuta

Recent Posts

Federal Trade Commission Votes To Ban Noncompete Agreements

On Tuesday, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) banned noncompete agreements in a 3-2 vote. The…

3 days ago

California Bill Would Prevent CLEAR Passengers From Line-Jumping At Airports

A proposed bill in California would prohibit security screening company CLEAR from skipping the general…

4 days ago

Supreme Court Seems Receptive To Laws That Allow Restrictions On Homeless

On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments over a challenge to a law allowing…

5 days ago

Arizona Republicans Block Bill To Repeal Abortion Ban On State House Floor

The Arizona House of Representatives failed to advance a repeal of the state's 160-year-old abortion…

6 days ago

After Oregon Recriminalizes Drug Possession, What’s Next For The State’s Drug Policy

Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek (D) signed a bill restoring criminal charges in cases of hard drug possession.…

1 week ago

Biden’s New Regulation Will Limit Toxic Chemicals In Drinking Water Across The Country

President Joe Biden's administration announced the first-ever national limits on toxic "forever chemicals" in drinking water. This…

2 weeks ago