News

Texas & Florida Laws Limiting Social Media Platforms From Censoring Posts Are Likely To Be Struck Down By Supreme Court, Experts Say

New social media laws in Texas and Florida seem likely to be ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, legal experts agree. 

The laws in the two southern states attempt to limit the control that social media companies have on the content that appears on their websites. In a court hearing on the laws, a majority of the Supreme Court justices appeared to support the view that these laws violate the First Amendment rights of social media firms, forcing them to carry all viewpoints and continue platforming all political candidates. 

The Republican legislators who passed these laws were inspired by Twitter’s banning of former President Donald Trump from the app for violating rules against inciting violence after the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot. The states are looking to prevent similar bans from happening in the future, along with preventing conservative voices from being “silenced” across all social media platforms.

If these laws take effect, the companies argue that it will then be impossible for social media platforms to control all forms of harmful content. Two advocacy groups, Netchoice and the Computer and Communications Information Association, claim that these laws violate the First Amendment rights of social media executives to make decisions about what content should be allowed on their platforms.

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Ketanji Brown Jackson both expressed uncertainty that the laws are constitutional.

Conservatives Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch voiced the view that the laws protect free speech. Alito called social media censorship “Orwellian.”

“If you have materials that are involved in suicide prevention, you also have to have material that advocate suicide promotion. Or if you have those on your site that are pro-Semitic, then you have to let materials onto your site that are anti-semitic,” said Paul Clements, the lawyer for the trade groups. 

Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar said that the court should make it clear that major social media companies have protections over their own editorial decisions, but the cases should be sent to lower courts for further clarity on how the laws will impact smaller platforms.

Simone Bieglmeier

Recent Posts

VIDEO: Trump Watches SpaceX Launch Alongside Elon Musk & Ted Cruz

https://youtube.com/shorts/YVrfbMZSVRE?feature=share US President-elect Donald Trump drew cheers as he arrived in Texas on Nov. 19 to watch…

2 days ago

Foreign Policy Experts Voice Concern About Trump’s Nomination Of Tulsi Gabbard For Director Of National Intelligence

After President-elect Donald Trump selected Tulsi Gabbard, a former Democratic congresswoman, as his nominee for…

3 days ago

Trump’s Pick Of Vaccine-Skeptic Robert F. Kennedy Jr. As Department of Health & Human Services Secretary Alarms Scientific Community

President-elect Donald Trump's announcement that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. will be his pick for Department…

4 days ago

VIDEO: President-Elect Donald Trump, Elon Musk & Cabinet Picks Attend UFC Fight In NYC, Crowd Chants “USA”

https://youtube.com/shorts/6CUvTmS87UM?feature=share President-elect Donald Trump arrived to cheers at an Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) event in…

4 days ago

Trump Pick Of Matt Gaetz For Attorney General Sends Shock Waves Through Capitol

President-elect Donald Trump's nomination of former Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Florida) as his attorney general has sent shockwaves through…

5 days ago

VIDEO: Fights Break Out In Stand During France-Israel Match

https://youtube.com/shorts/TD8RNJl-NBk A fight broke out in one of the stands at the Stade de France…

5 days ago