News

Texas & Florida Laws Limiting Social Media Platforms From Censoring Posts Are Likely To Be Struck Down By Supreme Court, Experts Say

New social media laws in Texas and Florida seem likely to be ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, legal experts agree. 

The laws in the two southern states attempt to limit the control that social media companies have on the content that appears on their websites. In a court hearing on the laws, a majority of the Supreme Court justices appeared to support the view that these laws violate the First Amendment rights of social media firms, forcing them to carry all viewpoints and continue platforming all political candidates. 

The Republican legislators who passed these laws were inspired by Twitter’s banning of former President Donald Trump from the app for violating rules against inciting violence after the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot. The states are looking to prevent similar bans from happening in the future, along with preventing conservative voices from being “silenced” across all social media platforms.

If these laws take effect, the companies argue that it will then be impossible for social media platforms to control all forms of harmful content. Two advocacy groups, Netchoice and the Computer and Communications Information Association, claim that these laws violate the First Amendment rights of social media executives to make decisions about what content should be allowed on their platforms.

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Ketanji Brown Jackson both expressed uncertainty that the laws are constitutional.

Conservatives Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch voiced the view that the laws protect free speech. Alito called social media censorship “Orwellian.”

“If you have materials that are involved in suicide prevention, you also have to have material that advocate suicide promotion. Or if you have those on your site that are pro-Semitic, then you have to let materials onto your site that are anti-semitic,” said Paul Clements, the lawyer for the trade groups. 

Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar said that the court should make it clear that major social media companies have protections over their own editorial decisions, but the cases should be sent to lower courts for further clarity on how the laws will impact smaller platforms.

Simone Bieglmeier

Recent Posts

Trump National Security Adviser Michael Flynn Says ‘Gates Of Hell’ Will Be Opened On Opponents If Trump Is Reelected

Former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn declared that the "gates of hell" would be unleashed if former…

15 hours ago

VIDEO: Kamala Harris Hugs First Person In Line For Her Ellipse Rally, Chats With Her Mom

https://youtu.be/JQCdk-71tG0 Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris met with the woman who was the first in…

16 hours ago

VIDEO: Harris Vows To Put ‘Country Above Party’ In Front Of 75,000 People At The Ellipse

https://youtu.be/xc72fdqkaVc Vice President Kamala Harris vowed to put “country above party and above self” as…

1 day ago

Trump-Friendly Judge Aileen Cannon In The Running For Attorney General If Former President Wins Second Term

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon has reportedly been placed on a list of potential attorney general candidates…

1 day ago

House Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Harris Suggests North Carolina Award Trump Its Electoral Votes – Before Election Day

Rep. Andy Harris (R-Maryland) declared that North Carolina's state legislature should give its electors to former President Donald…

2 days ago

Trump Says He ‘Didn’t Hear’ Comedian Tony Hinchcliffe Who Called Puerto Rico ‘A Floating Pile Of Garbage’ At MSG Rally

Comedian Tony Hinchcliffe has been condemned for saying that Puerto Rico is a "floating pile of garbage"…

2 days ago