News

Prosecutors Accuse Jeffrey Epstein Of Trying To Bribe Witnesses With $350,000 Payment

Jeffrey Epstein, the billionaire arrested on charges of child sex trafficking, has been accused of attempting to buy off potential witnesses against him by wiring them $350,000, according to court documents unsealed last week.

The allegations were made by the United States attorney’s office in Manhattan as part of a movement requesting that Epstein be denied bail on grounds that his vast wealth made him liable to flee the country or attempt to tamper with witnesses.

The prosecutors stated that Epstein had wired the money from an account he controlled to the potential witnesses in late November and December of 2018, shortly after the Miami Herald published an expose detailing Epstein’s 2008 sweetheart deal that largely prevented him from being punished for charges of child sex trafficking in Florida over a decade ago. That deal allowed Epstein to serve merely 13 months in jail, during which he was allowed to spend 12 hours a day, six days a week, in his work office in exchange for pleading guilty to two counts of soliciting prostitution from a minor.

SLIDESHOW: TOP DEMOCRATS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2020

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

The bail memorandum stated that Epstein had “paid significant amounts of money to influence individuals who were close to him during the time period charged in this case and who might be witnesses against him at a trial.”

The documents asserted that Epstein had wired $100,000 to an individual who had been named as a possible co-conspirator in the Florida case two days after the Herald published its piece. Three days after that, Epstein sent $250,000 to another figure who was named as a potential co-conspirator in the Florida case and was also identified in the New York indictment as an employee who helped the billionaire with his child sex ring.

Prosecutors claimed that the timing of the payments “suggests the defendant was attempting to further influence co-conspirators who might provide information against him in light of the recently re-emerging allegations.”

Daniel Knopf

Recent Posts

Federal Trade Commission Votes To Ban Noncompete Agreements

On Tuesday, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) banned noncompete agreements in a 3-2 vote. The…

2 days ago

California Bill Would Prevent CLEAR Passengers From Line-Jumping At Airports

A proposed bill in California would prohibit security screening company CLEAR from skipping the general…

3 days ago

Supreme Court Seems Receptive To Laws That Allow Restrictions On Homeless

On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments over a challenge to a law allowing…

4 days ago

Arizona Republicans Block Bill To Repeal Abortion Ban On State House Floor

The Arizona House of Representatives failed to advance a repeal of the state's 160-year-old abortion…

5 days ago

After Oregon Recriminalizes Drug Possession, What’s Next For The State’s Drug Policy

Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek (D) signed a bill restoring criminal charges in cases of hard drug possession.…

1 week ago

Biden’s New Regulation Will Limit Toxic Chemicals In Drinking Water Across The Country

President Joe Biden's administration announced the first-ever national limits on toxic "forever chemicals" in drinking water. This…

1 week ago