News

New Trump Policy To Weaken Civil Rights Discrimination Law For Housing

President Donald Trump is working on weakening the civil rights-era Fair Housing Act, which protects homeowners and renters from discrimination. 

Housing advocates claim the new policy will make it much more difficult to bring lawsuits claiming discrimination, while conservatives believe the new move would stop insubstantial lawsuits. 

A draft of the Department of Housing and Urban Development rules would target “disparate impact.” Disparate impact are practices in housing that affect a group of protected people more than others even though the rules should apply to everyone equally. This means that to prove discrimination in a lawsuit, plaintiffs don’t have to prove that a company is refusing to make loans to minorities, only that a company has a policy that has a discriminatory aftermath. 

The proposal is set to be announced in August. 

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

A recent lawsuit claims Bank of America was treating foreclosed homes in minority neighborhoods drastically poorly. Lawns weren’t mowed, windows were missing, and their entrances weren’t secured. 

Lisa Rice, president of the National Fair Housing Alliance, says she looked at foreclosed properties in more than 70 communities across the country. According to her, all had comparable levels of owner-occupied homes. In response to this lawsuit, she said, “In the white communities that we looked at, the story was completely different. “The grass was mowed, the doors were secure, the windows were not broken, we didn’t see trash and debris.”

Bank of America denies the claims of the lawsuit, stating, “Our commitment to sustainable homeownership for low- to moderate-income and multicultural clients and communities has always been a hallmark of Bank of America.” 

In this case, if the new policy is adopted, plaintiffs would now have to prove that the company’s policies were intended to be discriminatory, whereas before, plaintiffs only had to prove that the policy itself was discriminatory. 

Anacaona Rodriguez Martinez

Recent Posts

VIDEO: Trump Watches SpaceX Launch Alongside Elon Musk & Ted Cruz

https://youtube.com/shorts/YVrfbMZSVRE?feature=share US President-elect Donald Trump drew cheers as he arrived in Texas on Nov. 19 to watch…

2 days ago

Foreign Policy Experts Voice Concern About Trump’s Nomination Of Tulsi Gabbard For Director Of National Intelligence

After President-elect Donald Trump selected Tulsi Gabbard, a former Democratic congresswoman, as his nominee for…

3 days ago

Trump’s Pick Of Vaccine-Skeptic Robert F. Kennedy Jr. As Department of Health & Human Services Secretary Alarms Scientific Community

President-elect Donald Trump's announcement that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. will be his pick for Department…

4 days ago

VIDEO: President-Elect Donald Trump, Elon Musk & Cabinet Picks Attend UFC Fight In NYC, Crowd Chants “USA”

https://youtube.com/shorts/6CUvTmS87UM?feature=share President-elect Donald Trump arrived to cheers at an Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) event in…

4 days ago

Trump Pick Of Matt Gaetz For Attorney General Sends Shock Waves Through Capitol

President-elect Donald Trump's nomination of former Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Florida) as his attorney general has sent shockwaves through…

5 days ago

VIDEO: Fights Break Out In Stand During France-Israel Match

https://youtube.com/shorts/TD8RNJl-NBk A fight broke out in one of the stands at the Stade de France…

5 days ago