News

Grand Jury Material From Mueller Investigation To Remain Sealed Likely Through November Election

The Supreme Court granted the Trump administration’s request on Thursday to consider whether grand jury material from former Special Counsel Robert Mueller‘s investigation can be released to Congress, meaning any evidence or documents will likely not be released before the November election — regardless of whether the Democrat-led House wins the case.

The documents in question include portions of Mueller’s report that were redacted to protect grand jury information, such as testimony and exhibits pertaining to the Russia investigation.

Dozens of witnesses testified before Mueller’s grand jury including President Donald Trump‘s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort and at least two people who attended the infamous Trump Tower meeting in summer 2016 with a Kremlin-linked lawyer.

The court’s move is a victory for the Justice Department, which has been trying to prevent the information from being turned over to Congress. Democrats have argued the documents could reveal important information about Russian election interference in 2016 and Trump’s response to it.

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-New York) said he was “confident” Congress would win the case, but was nonetheless disappointed by the court’s decision.

“Unfortunately, President Trump and Attorney General [William] Barr are continuing to try to run out the clock on any and all accountability. While I am confident their legal arguments will fail, it is now all the more important for the American people to hold the President accountable at the ballot box in November,” Nadler said in a statement.

The federal appeals court in Washington ruled in March that the documents should be turned over, noting that Mueller’s 448-report “stopped short” of determining whether Trump obstructed justice, and thus did not interfere with Congress’ impeachment power.

However, the Justice Department told the Supreme Court in filings that the House has not shown that it “urgently needs these materials for any ongoing impeachment investigation,” despite some talk that the information contained in the documents could lead to a second round of impeachment charges.

Katherine Huggins

Share
Published by
Katherine Huggins

Recent Posts

VIDEO: California Sen. Alex Padilla Forcibly Removed & Thrown To Ground During Homeland Security Sec. Kirsti Noem’s Press Conference

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/-5miskGO5lo California Senator Alex Padilla was forcibly removed from a press conference held by the…

5 hours ago

Trump’s Rally-Style Speech At Fort Bragg Spurs Controversy Over Politicization Of The Military

President Donald Trump delivered a politically charged address Tuesday during a rally marking the Army’s…

6 hours ago

140K-Lb. Tanks For Army Parade On Trump’s Birthday Expected To Do $16M In Damage To D.C. Roads

On June 14, thousands of troops, 28 tanks and 100 other vehicles are expected to…

7 hours ago

Robert F. Kennedy’s Appointment Of Anti-Vax Members To CDC’s Vaccine Advisory Committee Alarms Experts

Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. appointed eight new…

10 hours ago

Trump’s DNI Tulsi Gabbard Posts ‘Strange’ Video Warning Of ‘Nuclear Holocaust’; ‘Needs To Change Her Meds,’ GOP Senator Advises

Tulsi Gabbard, the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), posted a video to X, a social…

1 day ago

GOP Rep. Mary Miller Slammed For Criticizing Sikh Man Delivering Prayer In Congress, Confusing Him With A Muslim

A Republican congresswoman is facing bipartisan backlash after calling a Sikh's deliverance of a morning…

1 day ago