News

Federal Judge Blocks Use Of Defense Department Funds In Building Border Wall

A Federal judge in Texas, David Briones, blocked the Trump administration from utilizing billions of dollars in Pentagon funds for the building of the border wall with Mexico. 

Judge Briones of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas said Tuesday that the administration cannot appropriate military construction funds to build additional barriers on the U.S. southern border with Mexico.

SLIDESHOW: TOP DEMOCRATS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2020

The ruling has dealt a blow to the Trump administration. The administration has tried to muster money for President Donald Trump’s signature campaign promise of a border wall.

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

This is another body blow that the judiciary has dealt Trump of late on critical issues, including his immigration policies and refusal to release his tax returns to Congress.

It targets only one set of Pentagon funds, however, leaving in place the money the U.S. Supreme Court allowed to be used earlier this year.

In September, Secretary of Defense Mark Esper authorized diverting of $3.6 billion in military construction funds for 11 wall projects on the southern border with Mexico. The Pentagon said at the time that half the money was coming from deferred projects overseas, and the other half was planned for projects in the U.S.

“DoD is evaluating the injunction right now, and will work with the Department of Justice on the next steps. DoD will comply with all court orders,” said Pentagon spokesman Lt. Col. Chris Mitchell in a statement.

The lawsuit, brought by El Paso County, Texas, and Border Network for Human Rights, argued that Trump overreached his authority when issuing a national emergency declaration to gain access to additional funds for his border wall, despite receiving $1.375 billion from Congress.

“The President’s emergency proclamation was a blatant attempt to grab power from Congress. Today’s order affirms that the President is not a king and that our courts are willing to check him when he oversteps his bounds,” said Kristy Parker, counsel for Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan nonprofit which represented the plaintiffs, in a statement.

Like
Like Love Haha Wow Sad Angry
Rajeet Guha

Recent Posts

Trump ‘Jokes’ With Zelensky About Not Holding U.S. Elections In 2028

President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin’s summit in Alaska didn’t result in a…

1 hour ago

Biden Warns About ‘Dark Days’ Under Trump Administration: ‘Get Ready, Folks, This Is Just Starting’

At the National Bar Association's annual convention, Former President Joe Biden warned of impending "dark…

4 hours ago

Trump Administration’s New Citizenship Review Asks Applicants To Show ‘Good Moral Character’

A recent policy memo from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) said that citizenship reviews…

5 hours ago

Trump Shows Off ‘Trump 2028’ Hats To European Leaders At The White House

On August 18, President Donald Trump met with several European leaders to continue discussing negotiations…

22 hours ago

Texas House Passes Controversial New Congressional Map That Will Likely Add 5 New Republican Seats

On Wednesday, the Texas House passed new congressional maps that favor Republicans, marking a significant…

1 day ago

Russia Launches Attack On Ukraine Just Hours After Trump & Zelensky Meet in Washington

Russian military forces launched a wave of missile and drone strikes on Ukrainian cities just…

1 day ago