News

Donald Trump Expresses Interest In U.S. Leaving NATO, House Passes Bill To Prevent Withdrawal

While the United States has been a fixture in NATO since its inception in 1949, President Donald Trump often threatened to leave it throughout 2018, according to a new report in The New York Times.

Trump’s aides reportedly were uncertain if he was serious the first time he proposed the idea, although his frequent comments about leaving NATO confirmed otherwise. Trump has periodically been a vocal critic of the alliance, previously questioning if it was still essential and offering harsh words for other members he believed weren’t paying their share in defense spending.

During last year’s NATO summit, Trump caused controversy when he exclaimed that Germany and other countries were “totally controlled by Russia.” Trump’s commitment to the organization was a biting fear for its other members.

SLIDESHOW: DONALD TRUMP’S 30 CRAZIEST TWEETS

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

According to CNN, NATO officials worked hard last year to keep Trump engaged in the alliance and its place in the world. Evidentially, the concern came more so from fear that Trump would fail to honor the commitment to other NATO members than from him outright leaving. Russian President Vladimir Putin has long hoped to see NATO weaken. It would be a victory from him if the United States were to withdraw from it.

However, legislation was passed in the House on Tuesday that re-emphasizes the country’s commitment to NATO as a response to Trump’s alleged desire to leave it. The bill was a bipartisan victory for the House, with a 357-22 vote approving it. The legislation re-affirms that maintaining its NATO membership is a United States policy, and money will not be allocated to withdrawing from it.

50 Celebrities Who Have Died In 2018 – Tribute Slideshow

Trump’s wavering support for the alliance is “disturbing” and “troubling” according to House Foreign Affairs Chairman Eliot Engel, who gave a news conference outside Capitol Hill. “You know what a burden would be? A burden would be for the United States to try and conduct foreign policy without allies, without 28 other countries that share our values and have fought alongside American troops, sharing the burden of lost blood and treasure at times.”

Matt Reisine

A writer for uPolitics with an array of interests.

Recent Posts

‘National Enquirer’ Publisher David Pecker Testifies In Trump’s Hush Money Trial

On Friday, former American Media CEO David Pecker concluded his testimony about meetings he had with…

2 days ago

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene Says Motion To Vacate Speakership Is Coming Regardless OF Pressure From Party

On Sunday, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia) said her motion to vacate the speakership is "coming" regardless…

3 days ago

Federal Trade Commission Votes To Ban Noncompete Agreements

On Tuesday, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) banned noncompete agreements in a 3-2 vote. The…

6 days ago

California Bill Would Prevent CLEAR Passengers From Line-Jumping At Airports

A proposed bill in California would prohibit security screening company CLEAR from skipping the general…

7 days ago

Supreme Court Seems Receptive To Laws That Allow Restrictions On Homeless

On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments over a challenge to a law allowing…

1 week ago

Arizona Republicans Block Bill To Repeal Abortion Ban On State House Floor

The Arizona House of Representatives failed to advance a repeal of the state's 160-year-old abortion…

1 week ago