2020 Candidates

Legal Scholars At Impeachment Hearing Say Trump’s Misconduct Is ‘Worst In U.S. History’

Democrats from the House Judiciary Committee invited three legal scholars to the impeachment proceedings Wednesday to determine whether President Donald Trump’s maladministration warranted impeachment.

The constitutional scholars feverishly sparred over case evidence and found that Trump’s conduct amounted to the worst behavior of a U.S. President in history. His efforts to obstruct justice and solicit a foreign investigation into 2020 Democratic Presidential Candidate Joe Biden met the constitutional threshold for impeachment.

SLIDESHOW: TOP DEMOCRATS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2020

“The president’s serious misconduct, including bribery, soliciting a personal favor from a foreign leader in exchange for his exercise of power, and obstructing justice and Congress, are worse than the misconduct of any prior president, including what previous presidents who faced impeachment have done or been accused of doing,” Michael Gerhardt, a legal scholar, wrote in his opening statement to the House Judiciary Committee.

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

The legal scholars agreed that if Congress did not impeach Trump, the impeachment process itself would lose all meaning. Trump’s efforts to pressure Ukraine for political gain was an impeachable act – an abuse of power.

“This is precisely misconduct that the framers created a Constitution, including impeachment, to protect against. If Congress concludes they are going to give a pass to the president here, every other president will say, ‘Ok, then I can do the same thing.’ And the boundaries will just evaporate, and those boundaries are set up by the Constitution. And we may be, unfortunately, witnessing their erosion. And that is a danger to all of us,” Gerhardt stated.

The House of Representatives’ new proceedings phase, involving the House Judiciary Committee, on Wednesday, featured several law professors who specialize in constitutional law and the impeachment process. It was the first day of hearings followed by last month’s House Intelligence testimonies.

Emily Bevacqua

Recent Posts

Federal Trade Commission Votes To Ban Noncompete Agreements

On Tuesday, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) banned noncompete agreements in a 3-2 vote. The…

1 day ago

California Bill Would Prevent CLEAR Passengers From Line-Jumping At Airports

A proposed bill in California would prohibit security screening company CLEAR from skipping the general…

2 days ago

Supreme Court Seems Receptive To Laws That Allow Restrictions On Homeless

On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments over a challenge to a law allowing…

3 days ago

Arizona Republicans Block Bill To Repeal Abortion Ban On State House Floor

The Arizona House of Representatives failed to advance a repeal of the state's 160-year-old abortion…

4 days ago

After Oregon Recriminalizes Drug Possession, What’s Next For The State’s Drug Policy

Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek (D) signed a bill restoring criminal charges in cases of hard drug possession.…

1 week ago

Biden’s New Regulation Will Limit Toxic Chemicals In Drinking Water Across The Country

President Joe Biden's administration announced the first-ever national limits on toxic "forever chemicals" in drinking water. This…

1 week ago