News

U.S. Supreme Court Hears Cases On Trump’s Lawsuits To Prevent Release Of His Financial Records

Over a three-hour conference call on Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court considered a potential middle ground on President Donald Trump‘s bid to maintain the secrecy of his financial records in cases that could impact the November election and challenge constitutional principles.

The justices struggled to find a strategic compromise among the needs of the president, state prosecutors and lawmakers. While Trump is advocating for absolute non-compliance with state grand jury subpoenas involving his financial records, the justices considered a third way – a partial limitation of the powers of lawmakers and prosecutors.

The cases concern the public release of Trump’s tax returns and an ongoing criminal investigation in New York.

Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh weighed in on the situation, assessing the competing interests at play. “The question then boils down to: how can we protect the House’s interest in obtaining information it needs to legislate but also protect the presidency?” Kavanaugh said.

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor voiced her worries about a Trump power play. “I see a tremendous separation of powers problem,” she observed.

Deputy Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall told the justices that the president’s personal records can’t be subpoenaed without clearly showing that the information is needed for a legitimate legislative purpose.

“I think we all know it’s about the president,” Wall said.

The justices are also evaluating whether the subpoenas would put too much burden on the president, but Sotomayor questioned whether the overwhelming suspicion of criminal activity wasn’t enough to further the investigation.

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. is looking into Trump’s potential falsification of business records to conceal payments made to two women who claimed they had sex with him.

The cases before the court are Trump v. Vance, 19-635; Trump v. Mazars, 19-715; and Trump v. Deutsche Bank, 19-760.

CORONAVIRUS FAQ: WIKI OF MOST FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS 

Antonio Clibrizzi

Recent Posts

Federal Trade Commission Votes To Ban Noncompete Agreements

On Tuesday, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) banned noncompete agreements in a 3-2 vote. The…

2 days ago

California Bill Would Prevent CLEAR Passengers From Line-Jumping At Airports

A proposed bill in California would prohibit security screening company CLEAR from skipping the general…

3 days ago

Supreme Court Seems Receptive To Laws That Allow Restrictions On Homeless

On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments over a challenge to a law allowing…

4 days ago

Arizona Republicans Block Bill To Repeal Abortion Ban On State House Floor

The Arizona House of Representatives failed to advance a repeal of the state's 160-year-old abortion…

5 days ago

After Oregon Recriminalizes Drug Possession, What’s Next For The State’s Drug Policy

Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek (D) signed a bill restoring criminal charges in cases of hard drug possession.…

1 week ago

Biden’s New Regulation Will Limit Toxic Chemicals In Drinking Water Across The Country

President Joe Biden's administration announced the first-ever national limits on toxic "forever chemicals" in drinking water. This…

1 week ago