News

U.S. Supreme Court Hears Cases On Trump’s Lawsuits To Prevent Release Of His Financial Records

Like
Like Love Haha Wow Sad Angry

Over a three-hour conference call on Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court considered a potential middle ground on President Donald Trump‘s bid to maintain the secrecy of his financial records in cases that could impact the November election and challenge constitutional principles.

The justices struggled to find a strategic compromise among the needs of the president, state prosecutors and lawmakers. While Trump is advocating for absolute non-compliance with state grand jury subpoenas involving his financial records, the justices considered a third way – a partial limitation of the powers of lawmakers and prosecutors.

The cases concern the public release of Trump’s tax returns and an ongoing criminal investigation in New York.

Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh weighed in on the situation, assessing the competing interests at play. “The question then boils down to: how can we protect the House’s interest in obtaining information it needs to legislate but also protect the presidency?” Kavanaugh said.

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor voiced her worries about a Trump power play. “I see a tremendous separation of powers problem,” she observed.

Deputy Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall told the justices that the president’s personal records can’t be subpoenaed without clearly showing that the information is needed for a legitimate legislative purpose.

“I think we all know it’s about the president,” Wall said.

The justices are also evaluating whether the subpoenas would put too much burden on the president, but Sotomayor questioned whether the overwhelming suspicion of criminal activity wasn’t enough to further the investigation.

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. is looking into Trump’s potential falsification of business records to conceal payments made to two women who claimed they had sex with him.

The cases before the court are Trump v. Vance, 19-635; Trump v. Mazars, 19-715; and Trump v. Deutsche Bank, 19-760.

CORONAVIRUS FAQ: WIKI OF MOST FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS 

Like
Like Love Haha Wow Sad Angry
Antonio Clibrizzi

Share
Published by
Antonio Clibrizzi

Recent Posts

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis Promises Redistricting Effort To Give GOP More House Seats

Texas is currently the focus of the national redistricting battle, but Florida may soon join…

9 hours ago

Defense Sec. Pete Hegseth Shares Video Of Pastor Calling For Gay Sex To Be Made Illegal

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reposted a video on X that features Doug Wilson, the co-founder…

13 hours ago

Trump Fires IRS Commissioner Billy Long, Who Was Accused Of Exploiting Tax Loopholes – Becomes Shortest-Serving Head Ever

On Friday, President Donald Trump dismissed Billy Long as commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service…

13 hours ago

Newly Released Footage Shows Trump Justice Department Official Jared Wise Urging Jan. 6 Rioters to ‘Kill’ Police Officers

Police bodycam footage revealed at the trial of Jared Wise, who currently serves as a…

16 hours ago

Trump Deploys National Guard To D.C., Takes Control Of Police Department

On Monday, President Donald Trump ordered the deployment of the National Guard to the nation’s…

16 hours ago

FBI Fires 2 Top Officials Who Opposed Trump Efforts To Root Out Jan. 6 Investigators

Two senior members of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) who blocked efforts to expose…

1 day ago