News

U.S. Supreme Court Hears Cases On Trump’s Lawsuits To Prevent Release Of His Financial Records

Over a three-hour conference call on Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court considered a potential middle ground on President Donald Trump‘s bid to maintain the secrecy of his financial records in cases that could impact the November election and challenge constitutional principles.

The justices struggled to find a strategic compromise among the needs of the president, state prosecutors and lawmakers. While Trump is advocating for absolute non-compliance with state grand jury subpoenas involving his financial records, the justices considered a third way – a partial limitation of the powers of lawmakers and prosecutors.

The cases concern the public release of Trump’s tax returns and an ongoing criminal investigation in New York.

Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh weighed in on the situation, assessing the competing interests at play. “The question then boils down to: how can we protect the House’s interest in obtaining information it needs to legislate but also protect the presidency?” Kavanaugh said.

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor voiced her worries about a Trump power play. “I see a tremendous separation of powers problem,” she observed.

Deputy Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall told the justices that the president’s personal records can’t be subpoenaed without clearly showing that the information is needed for a legitimate legislative purpose.

“I think we all know it’s about the president,” Wall said.

The justices are also evaluating whether the subpoenas would put too much burden on the president, but Sotomayor questioned whether the overwhelming suspicion of criminal activity wasn’t enough to further the investigation.

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. is looking into Trump’s potential falsification of business records to conceal payments made to two women who claimed they had sex with him.

The cases before the court are Trump v. Vance, 19-635; Trump v. Mazars, 19-715; and Trump v. Deutsche Bank, 19-760.

CORONAVIRUS FAQ: WIKI OF MOST FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS 

Antonio Clibrizzi

Share
Published by
Antonio Clibrizzi

Recent Posts

Republicans Push Back On Trump’s Proposed 30% National Park Service Cuts

President Donald Trump has proposed a 30% budget cut to the National Park Service (NPS),…

11 hours ago

Judge Orders EPA To Continue Funding Environmental Justice Grants For Low-Income & Minority Communities Terminated By Trump Administration

A federal judge ruled that the $600 million in environmental justice grants terminated by the…

12 hours ago

Former Rep. Colin Allred Tries Again To Flip Texas Senate Seat – Control Of Senate Could Hang In The Balance

Last month, former Rep. Colin Allred (D-Texas) announced his run for Senate. Allred previously lost…

14 hours ago

Biden Says He Authorized All Pardon Decisions After Republicans Claim Many Were Issued Without His Knowledge

Former President Joe Biden said he had granted every pardon and commutation issued at the…

17 hours ago

Senate Confirms Trump Nominee To Head FAA, Bryan Bedford, Who Falsely Claimed To Have Commercial Pilot’s License On Resume

Bryan Bedford, President Donald Trump's nominee to head the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), was confirmed…

18 hours ago

Trump Orders Strict Rules To Discourage Clean Energy Projects In Nod House Conservatives

Following the recent passage of the “Big, Beautiful Bill,” President Donald Trump has instructed the…

1 day ago