News

Trump Avoiding Using Defense Production Act In Responding To Coronavirus Despite Urgent Need For Masks & Ventilators

President Donald Trump has not yet exercised the powers of the Defense Production Act, despite invoking it last Wednesday. The act would allow him to direct private companies to produce goods needed to combat the novel coronavirus (COVID-19), such as masks and ventilators.

The Defense Production Act was established in 1950 during the Korean War to allow the government to direct private industries to produce weapons, vehicles and other wartime necessities. In 2009, Congress expanded it to include domestic preparedness and national emergency response.

The coronavirus pandemic, which Trump declared a state of emergency over, has caused a shortage of important medical supplies.

The ranking Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, Sen. Jack Reed (D-Rhode Island), said the act is critical for ensuring the fast production of ventilators and other medical supplies.

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

“Instead of preparing and mobilizing for this pandemic, President Trump tried to downplay it,” Reed said in a statement. ” As a result, America is not as ready as we should be. In France, factories that once manufactured fancy perfumes are starting to churn out needed hand sanitizer instead. You can’t do these things overnight. It takes planning and coordination. President Trump is finally taking needed steps, but we’ve got to do more.”

Trump has not yet put the act to use, because he is apparently afraid of “nationalizing our business” and turning into Venezuela.

“We’re a country not based on nationalizing our business,” Trump said at a Sunday White House press conference. “Call a person over in Venezuela; ask them how did nationalization of their businesses work out. Not too well. The concept of nationalizing our business is not a good concept.”

In a tweet announcing his decision to invoke the act, Trump said he would only use it “in a worst case scenario.”

“Hopefully there will be no need, but we are all in this TOGETHER!” he tweeted.

 

Katherine Huggins

Recent Posts

Federal Trade Commission Votes To Ban Noncompete Agreements

On Tuesday, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) banned noncompete agreements in a 3-2 vote. The…

2 days ago

California Bill Would Prevent CLEAR Passengers From Line-Jumping At Airports

A proposed bill in California would prohibit security screening company CLEAR from skipping the general…

3 days ago

Supreme Court Seems Receptive To Laws That Allow Restrictions On Homeless

On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments over a challenge to a law allowing…

4 days ago

Arizona Republicans Block Bill To Repeal Abortion Ban On State House Floor

The Arizona House of Representatives failed to advance a repeal of the state's 160-year-old abortion…

5 days ago

After Oregon Recriminalizes Drug Possession, What’s Next For The State’s Drug Policy

Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek (D) signed a bill restoring criminal charges in cases of hard drug possession.…

1 week ago

Biden’s New Regulation Will Limit Toxic Chemicals In Drinking Water Across The Country

President Joe Biden's administration announced the first-ever national limits on toxic "forever chemicals" in drinking water. This…

1 week ago