News

Supreme Court Denies Trump’s Effort To Block Jan. 6 Records From Committee

The United States Supreme Court rejected former President Donald Trump‘s effort to withhold records from the House select committee that is investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol attack.

The ruling ended in a 8-1 majority, with the Court’s most conservative justice, Clarence Thomas, being the only justice to side with Trump.

Trump contended that he had executive privilege as a former president, but President Joe Biden was willing to give the committee access to the files.

“The questions whether and in what circumstances a former President may obtain a court order preventing disclosure of privileged records from his tenure in office, in the face of a determination by the incumbent President to waive the privilege, are unprecedented and raise serious and substantial concerns,” the court said.

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

They did not directly answer those questions, but decided that Trump being the former president had nothing to do with the case since his “claims would have failed even if he were the incumbent,” the Supreme Court order said.

Over 700 pages of records will be sent to the committee.

Chairman Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Mississippi) and Vice-Chair Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyoming) said in a statement released Wednesday night that the committee has already begun to receive documents.

“Our work goes forward to uncover all the facts about the violence of January 6th and its causes,” the statement said. “We will not be deterred in our effort to get answers for the American people, make legislative recommendations to strengthen our democracy, and help ensure nothing like that day ever happens again.”

While the justices agreed that Trump needed to hand over the records, Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote an addition to the majority opinion. He said that former Presidents should, under normal circumstances, have communications privilege during their presidency.

“If Presidents and their advisers thought that the privilege’s protections would terminate at the end of the Presidency and that their privileged communications could be disclosed when the President left office (or were subject to the absolute control of a subsequent President who could be a political opponent of a former President), the consequences for the Presidency would be severe,” he wrote.

Kavanaugh also noted that executive privilege should not be absolute.

Rose Carter

Share
Published by
Rose Carter

Recent Posts

GOP Sen. Mike Lee Slammed For Mocking Minnesota Lawmaker Shootings & Spreading Misinformation On Social Media

Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) is facing criticism after mocking the recent deadly shootings targeting Democratic…

3 hours ago

Tucker Carlson Warns U.S. Involvement In Israel-Iran War Could ‘End Trump Presidency,’ Trump Calls Him ‘Kooky’

On Monday, podcast host Tucker Carlson highlighted a foreign-policy divide among Trump supporters during his…

3 hours ago

Trump’s Controversial $50M Military Parade Had Low Attendance & Many Empty Seats

On Saturday, President Donald Trump hosted a parade in Washington, D.C., to celebrate the 250th…

4 hours ago

Trump Urges Iran To Agree To Nuclear Deal Following Devastating Israeli Attacks

President Donald Trump issued a statement urging Iran to accept a nuclear deal to prevent…

23 hours ago

‘No Kings Day’ Protests Draw Large Crowds Across Major U.S. Cities, With Some Violence Reported

On Saturday, demonstrators across the U.S. participated in organized “No Kings Day” protests, which aimed…

23 hours ago

David Hogg To Leave DNC After Messy Feud With Democratic Party Leadership

Political activist David Hogg is leaving the Democratic National Committee after announcing he won’t run…

23 hours ago