News

Roger Stone Pleads The Fifth, Faces Contempt Charge After Refusing Jan. 6 Committee subpoena

Roger Stone, the notorious Republican operative and ex-adviser to former President Donald Trump, has invoked his Fifth Amendment constitutional right against self-incrimination ahead of his scheduled testimony before the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol.

Stone was subpoenaed by the Committee last month to testify about his knowledge of events leading up to the insurrection. If he declines to talk, he could be charged with criminal contempt of Congress, which is a federal misdemeanor that can carry hefty fines and a one-year prison sentence.

“In response to the recently served subpoena from the Select Committee, Mr. Stone has directed me to advise you that, as further discussed below, pursuant to the rights afforded him by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution, he declines to be deposed or produce documents,” Stone’s attorney Grant Smith wrote in a letter to the Committee.

There is “no question” that Stone has a “Constitutional right to decline to respond to questions,” Grant maintained.

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

Smith called the Select Committee’s document request “overreaching” and too “wide-ranging to be deemed anything other than a fishing expedition.”

Continuing on, Grant stated that “moreover, responding to the extensive requests requires the preparation of a detailed index and log describing the contents of the production, which in and of itself would be protected from disclosure by the U.S. Constitution. Thus given that Mr. Stone has been characterized in the press as under investigation by the DOJ and the FBI, responding to the document demand, which is plainly designed to elicit information about the existence of potentially incriminating evidence, would amount to a testimonial act, defeating the privilege being asserted,” adding that the probe itself “falsely implies that the exercise of First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and association and the right to petition the government for redress of grievances caused the illegal acts of January 6.”

Brandon Gage

Share
Published by
Brandon Gage

Recent Posts

Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard Tries To Grab Trump’s Attention With Fox News-Style Briefings

National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard is exploring new ways to present President Donald Trump's intelligence…

9 hours ago

Republican Rep. Brandon Gill Introduces Bill To Replace Benjamin Franklin With Donald Trump On $100 Bill

Two new acts in the House of Representatives could put President Donald Trump's image on…

10 hours ago

State Department To Resume Processing Visas For International Students, Now Requiring Access To Social Media Profiles

The U.S. State Department announced it will resume processing foreign student visas, with a new…

10 hours ago

ICE Raids Former Trump Business Rival As Administration Refocuses On Targeting Agricultural & Hospitality Workers

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raided Delta Downs Racetrack Casino Hotel in Vinton, Louisiana, whose…

10 hours ago

Trump Refuses To Call Gov. Tim Walz After Minnesota Lawmaker Shootings: ‘He’s A Mess’

President Donald Trump said that he would not be calling Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D)…

14 hours ago

Senate Republicans Look To Limit Power Of Courts To Restrain Trump Policies In Budget Bill

U.S. Senate Republicans have added language to President Donald Trump’s budget bill that would limit…

1 day ago