News

Rep. Jamie Raskin Proposes Abolishing The Electoral College: ‘It Doesn’t Fit Anymore’

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D–Maryland) called the Electoral College “a danger” to American democracy. In an interview with Face the Nation, he advocated for popular-vote winners to win the presidency.

“The Electoral College now – which has given us five popular-vote losers as president in our history, twice in this century alone – has become a danger, not just to democracy, but to the American people,” he said in the interview. “It was a danger on January 6.”

Hillary Clinton and Al Gore won the popular vote in 2016 and 2000, respectively. Both were defeated in the Electoral College – advancing candidates to the Presidency who received fewer votes.

Three other Presidential candidates lost because of the Electoral College: Andrew Jackson (1824), Samuel Tilden (1876) and Grover Cleveland (1888).

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

Raskin is one of the nine members of the House’s January 6 committee.

Raskin supports the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact – a pledge by multiple states and the District of Columbia to give their Presidential electoral votes to the popular-vote winner.

“The truth is that we need to be continually renovating and improving our institutions,” he said. “The [Constitution’s] framers were great, and they were patriots, but they didn’t have the benefit of the experience that we have lived, and we know that the Electoral College doesn’t fit anymore.”

The Electoral College was implemented to give states with smaller populations a greater say in the selection of presidents.

Raskin’s statements were made days after the January 6 Committee released its final report. The committee voted to recommend that the Justice Department criminally indict Donald Trump for his involvement in the attack.

Raskin pointed to the increasing threat of violence toward lawmakers as a direct threat to American democracy.

“What it means to live in a democracy with basic civic respect is that people can disagree without resorting to violence. But the internet has played a negative role, especially for the right wing, the extreme right, which now engages in very dangerous hyperbolic rhetoric that exposes people to danger.”

Ben Shimkus

Recent Posts

Federal Trade Commission Votes To Ban Noncompete Agreements

On Tuesday, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) banned noncompete agreements in a 3-2 vote. The…

17 hours ago

California Bill Would Prevent CLEAR Passengers From Line-Jumping At Airports

A proposed bill in California would prohibit security screening company CLEAR from skipping the general…

2 days ago

Supreme Court Seems Receptive To Laws That Allow Restrictions On Homeless

On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments over a challenge to a law allowing…

3 days ago

Arizona Republicans Block Bill To Repeal Abortion Ban On State House Floor

The Arizona House of Representatives failed to advance a repeal of the state's 160-year-old abortion…

4 days ago

After Oregon Recriminalizes Drug Possession, What’s Next For The State’s Drug Policy

Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek (D) signed a bill restoring criminal charges in cases of hard drug possession.…

1 week ago

Biden’s New Regulation Will Limit Toxic Chemicals In Drinking Water Across The Country

President Joe Biden's administration announced the first-ever national limits on toxic "forever chemicals" in drinking water. This…

1 week ago