News

North Carolina Supreme Court Allows Partisan Gerrymandering, Giving GOP Big Edge In New Maps

The North Carolina Supreme Court backtracked on a past ruling, allowing a gerrymandered map that was recently struck down by the same court to be reinstated.

Republicans, who regained control of the state’s Supreme Court in the midterm elections last year, joined together in the five-to-two decision. The ruling reverses a decision to throw out a map that heavily favored GOP candidates in statewide elections.

The Republican-majority court stated that the decision was an attempt to side-step political processes and remain neutral.

“There is no judicially manageable standard by which to adjudicate partisan gerrymandering claims. Courts are not intended to meddle in policy matters,” Chief Justice Paul Newby said in his majority opinion.

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

Other officials aren’t buying that interpretation. Former Attorney General Eric Holder, now the Chairman of the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, released a statement calling the court’s decision opportunistic.

“This shameful, delegitimizing decision to allow the unjust, blatant manipulation of North Carolina’s voting districts was not a function of legal principle, it was a function of political personnel and partisan opportunism,” Holder said. “Neither the map nor the law have changed since last year’s landmark rulings — only the makeup of the majority of the North Carolina Supreme Court has changed.”

In a separate decision, the court approved state rules to require photo identification while submitting a ballot.

The North Carolina decisions have national implications. The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments from North Carolina Republicans in December, who argued the “independent state legislature” theory. They asserted states have the ability to set their own federal elections regulations – taking away power from the national government to demand equal democratic rule.

The U.S. Supreme Court was likely to weigh in on North Carolina’s December decision – which could have reset national standards for individual state power in national elections. Now that the original decision has been reversed, the Supreme Court is unlikely to release a decision on state powers.

North Carolina Republicans are expected to pick up at least three seats currently held by Democrats under the new maps.

Ben Shimkus

Recent Posts

Democrats Attack Green Party Nominee Jill Stein In New Ad

A new ad about Green Party candidate Jill Stein has been released by Vice President Kamala Harris'…

14 hours ago

Jennifer Lopez Says Trump ‘Offended Every Latino In The Country’ With MSG Joke At Harris Rally

https://youtu.be/inbJpo6D4BQ Jennifer Lopez, campaigning with Kamala Harris on Oct. 31 in Nevada, said Donald Trump’s…

14 hours ago

Trump National Security Adviser Michael Flynn Says ‘Gates Of Hell’ Will Be Opened On Opponents If Trump Is Reelected

Former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn declared that the "gates of hell" would be unleashed if former…

2 days ago

VIDEO: Kamala Harris Hugs First Person In Line For Her Ellipse Rally, Chats With Her Mom

https://youtu.be/JQCdk-71tG0 Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris met with the woman who was the first in…

2 days ago

VIDEO: Harris Vows To Put ‘Country Above Party’ In Front Of 75,000 People At The Ellipse

https://youtu.be/xc72fdqkaVc Vice President Kamala Harris vowed to put “country above party and above self” as…

3 days ago

Trump-Friendly Judge Aileen Cannon In The Running For Attorney General If Former President Wins Second Term

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon has reportedly been placed on a list of potential attorney general candidates…

3 days ago