News

Michael Flynn Case To Continue After Appeals Court Rejects Bid To Dismiss By 8-2 Vote

Former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn‘s criminal case is moving forward, after an appeals court overwhelmingly rejected his bid to have the case quickly dismissed.

On Tuesday, the day after the appeals decision, Judge Emmet Sullivan told Flynn’s lawyers, the Department of Justice and a court-appointed lawyer to file a joint status report by Sept. 21 highlighting proposed next steps, including holding oral arguments on the DOJ’s request to drop its case against Flynn.

They must also suggest a schedule for the filing of briefs from the DOJ and Flynn, as well as for amicus curiae – outside responses to any of the briefs.

Flynn, who pleaded guilty in 2017 of lying to Federal Bureau of Investigation agents in connection with former special counsel Robert Mueller‘s Russia investigation, has since tried to withdraw his guilty plea and get the case dropped due to previously undisclosed documents. Flynn’s attorneys claim that the documents “establish that on January 25, 2017 … the agents and DOJ officials knew General Flynn’s statements were not material to any investigation.”

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

The DOJ indicated in May that it would drop its prosecution of the prominent Trump ally, but Sullivan prevented that from happening right off the bat. He instead appointed retired federal Judge John Gleeson to argue against dismissing the case, prompting Flynn’s legal team to assert that Sullivan was biased and overstepping his authority.

Before Sullivan decided whether or not Gleeson’s arguments merited a case dismissal, Flynn’s lawyers asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia to grant a writ of mandamus, which would effectively force Sullivan to dismiss the case.

A three-judge panel sided with Flynn, but the case was further prolonged when Sullivan asked all the judges on the appeals court to rehear the case.

Monday’s 8-2 ruling found that Sullivan’s actions nearly met a “very high standard” of “conduct … so extreme as to display clear inability to render fair judgment,” thus allowing the case to proceed.

Katherine Huggins

Share
Published by
Katherine Huggins

Recent Posts

10 Former GOP Congressmen Call Arrest Of Rep. LaMonica McIver At ICE Facility ‘Outrageous’

On May 20, Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-New Jersey) was charged with assault of two federal…

12 hours ago

Gun Control Advocates Say Trump Administration Has Effectively Legalized Machine Guns With New Policy

President Donald Trump and his administration have taken a step toward legalizing machine guns and…

14 hours ago

Once Seen As Future Of GOP, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’ Popularity Plummets Amid Scandal Involving Wife Casey

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) is facing a declining popularity following his decision to run…

16 hours ago

Transportation Sec. Sean Duffy Unloaded Stocks 2 Days Before Trump Announced Tariffs & Markets Tanked

On Feb. 11, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy sold stocks in 34 companies, valued between $75,000…

18 hours ago

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem Mocked After Being Unable To Define Habeas Corpus At Senate Hearing

In a Senate hearing this week, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem incorrectly defined the meaning…

1 day ago

Death Of Third House Democrat In 3 Months Weakens Party’s Power In Fight With GOP

The death of a third House Democrat in three months has significantly weakened the party's…

1 day ago