News

Kenneth Starr, Who Vigorously Pursued Bill Clinton’s Impeachment, Argues Impeachment Has Become ‘Partisan Exercise’ At Trump’s Senate Trial [Video]

Kenneth Starr, who President Donald Trump enlisted as a defense counsel for the Senate impeachment proceedings, warned the senators at the president’s trial on Monday that the impeachment process had become a “wanton partisan exercise.” It was a strange argument coming from Starr who vigorously pursued the impeachment of President Bill Clinton in the late 90s.

Starr offered a detailed historical and political account, with relevant examples, describing the Constitutional tasks and responsibilities that were supposed to be upheld in the Senate trial.

Starr cited Peggy Noonan‘s recent Wall Street Journal op-ed, which warned, “impeachment has now been normalized. It won’t be a once in a generation act, but an every administration act. Democrats will regret it when Republicans are handing out the pens.”

Trump was impeached after a whistleblower made a complaint to the House Select Committee on Intelligence in August 2019 about Trump’s blocking of around $400 million in funding to Ukraine to pressure the Ukrainian president into launching an investigation on the Bidens’ political and financial activities.

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

He also shared an account of how society ended up deeming impeachment as a mundane activity. “Briefly told, the story begins 42 years ago, in the wake of the long national nightmare of Watergate, Congress and President Jimmy Carter collaboratively ushered in a new chapter in America’s Constitutional history. Together, in full agreement, they enacted the independent counsel provisions of the Ethics and Government Act of 1978. But the new chapter was not simply the age of independent counsels. It became unbeknownst to the American people, the age of impeachment.”

Starr then shared that, however well-intentioned this era and intended provisions were, it was unconstitutional, “in the view of the [Justice] Department, those provisions intruded into the rightful domain and prerogative of the executive branch of the presidency.”

Emily Bevacqua

Recent Posts

Harris Closes Gap With Trump In New Polls

Since Vice President Kamala Harris' (D) started her campaign earlier this week, numerous polls have…

18 hours ago

Obamas Join Top Democrats In Endorsing VP Kamala Harris

In a brief video released Friday by the Harris campaign, former President Barack Obama and…

18 hours ago

Trump Files FEC Case Against Harris To Have Biden Funds Stripped From Her Campaign

Former President Donald Trump has filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission over the…

1 day ago

Harris Attacks Trump & Celebrates American Freedom In Debut Campaign Video

On Thursday, Vice President Kamala Harris released her first campaign ad attacking former President Donald…

1 day ago

Biden Delivers His Farewell Address To The Nation From The Oval Office

On Wednesday night, President Joe Biden addressed the nation from the Oval Office for the…

1 day ago

Democratic Lawmakers Organize Alternative Events In Opposition To Netanyahu’s Congressional Address

Several Democratic lawmakers participated in a series of counter-programming events instead of attending Israeli Prime…

2 days ago