News

Kenneth Starr, Who Vigorously Pursued Bill Clinton’s Impeachment, Argues Impeachment Has Become ‘Partisan Exercise’ At Trump’s Senate Trial [Video]

Kenneth Starr, who President Donald Trump enlisted as a defense counsel for the Senate impeachment proceedings, warned the senators at the president’s trial on Monday that the impeachment process had become a “wanton partisan exercise.” It was a strange argument coming from Starr who vigorously pursued the impeachment of President Bill Clinton in the late 90s.

Starr offered a detailed historical and political account, with relevant examples, describing the Constitutional tasks and responsibilities that were supposed to be upheld in the Senate trial.

Starr cited Peggy Noonan‘s recent Wall Street Journal op-ed, which warned, “impeachment has now been normalized. It won’t be a once in a generation act, but an every administration act. Democrats will regret it when Republicans are handing out the pens.”

Trump was impeached after a whistleblower made a complaint to the House Select Committee on Intelligence in August 2019 about Trump’s blocking of around $400 million in funding to Ukraine to pressure the Ukrainian president into launching an investigation on the Bidens’ political and financial activities.

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

He also shared an account of how society ended up deeming impeachment as a mundane activity. “Briefly told, the story begins 42 years ago, in the wake of the long national nightmare of Watergate, Congress and President Jimmy Carter collaboratively ushered in a new chapter in America’s Constitutional history. Together, in full agreement, they enacted the independent counsel provisions of the Ethics and Government Act of 1978. But the new chapter was not simply the age of independent counsels. It became unbeknownst to the American people, the age of impeachment.”

Starr then shared that, however well-intentioned this era and intended provisions were, it was unconstitutional, “in the view of the [Justice] Department, those provisions intruded into the rightful domain and prerogative of the executive branch of the presidency.”

Emily Bevacqua

Recent Posts

Federal Trade Commission Votes To Ban Noncompete Agreements

On Tuesday, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) banned noncompete agreements in a 3-2 vote. The…

3 days ago

California Bill Would Prevent CLEAR Passengers From Line-Jumping At Airports

A proposed bill in California would prohibit security screening company CLEAR from skipping the general…

4 days ago

Supreme Court Seems Receptive To Laws That Allow Restrictions On Homeless

On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments over a challenge to a law allowing…

5 days ago

Arizona Republicans Block Bill To Repeal Abortion Ban On State House Floor

The Arizona House of Representatives failed to advance a repeal of the state's 160-year-old abortion…

6 days ago

After Oregon Recriminalizes Drug Possession, What’s Next For The State’s Drug Policy

Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek (D) signed a bill restoring criminal charges in cases of hard drug possession.…

1 week ago

Biden’s New Regulation Will Limit Toxic Chemicals In Drinking Water Across The Country

President Joe Biden's administration announced the first-ever national limits on toxic "forever chemicals" in drinking water. This…

2 weeks ago