News

Kenneth Starr, Who Vigorously Pursued Bill Clinton’s Impeachment, Argues Impeachment Has Become ‘Partisan Exercise’ At Trump’s Senate Trial [Video]

Kenneth Starr, who President Donald Trump enlisted as a defense counsel for the Senate impeachment proceedings, warned the senators at the president’s trial on Monday that the impeachment process had become a “wanton partisan exercise.” It was a strange argument coming from Starr who vigorously pursued the impeachment of President Bill Clinton in the late 90s.

Starr offered a detailed historical and political account, with relevant examples, describing the Constitutional tasks and responsibilities that were supposed to be upheld in the Senate trial.

Starr cited Peggy Noonan‘s recent Wall Street Journal op-ed, which warned, “impeachment has now been normalized. It won’t be a once in a generation act, but an every administration act. Democrats will regret it when Republicans are handing out the pens.”

Trump was impeached after a whistleblower made a complaint to the House Select Committee on Intelligence in August 2019 about Trump’s blocking of around $400 million in funding to Ukraine to pressure the Ukrainian president into launching an investigation on the Bidens’ political and financial activities.

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

He also shared an account of how society ended up deeming impeachment as a mundane activity. “Briefly told, the story begins 42 years ago, in the wake of the long national nightmare of Watergate, Congress and President Jimmy Carter collaboratively ushered in a new chapter in America’s Constitutional history. Together, in full agreement, they enacted the independent counsel provisions of the Ethics and Government Act of 1978. But the new chapter was not simply the age of independent counsels. It became unbeknownst to the American people, the age of impeachment.”

Starr then shared that, however well-intentioned this era and intended provisions were, it was unconstitutional, “in the view of the [Justice] Department, those provisions intruded into the rightful domain and prerogative of the executive branch of the presidency.”

Emily Bevacqua

Share
Published by
Emily Bevacqua

Recent Posts

Defense Sec. Pete Hegseth Announces Removal Of Gay Rights Hero Harvey Milk’s Name From Navy Ship, Pelosi Calls Move ‘Shameful’

As celebrations begin to commemorate Pride Month in the U.S., Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced…

33 mins ago

California Gov. Gavin Newsom Calls Trump’s Threats To Arrest Him ‘Authoritarian’

In the wake of President Donald Trump's unilateral deployment of National Guard troops to Los…

51 mins ago

Bill Clinton Vouches For Biden’s Health & Cognitive Abilities: ‘He’s In Good Shape’

Former President Bill Clinton came to former President Joe Biden’s defense during an interview on…

24 hours ago

GOP Rep. Claudia Tenney Introduces Bill To Make Trump’s Birthday A National Holiday

A Republican congresswoman took a step further to promote her bill to designate President Donald…

1 day ago

Democrats Fume At Biden White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre For Exposé Book Deal & Abandoning Party

Former White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre announced that she is leaving the Democratic Party.…

1 day ago

After Senate Unanimously Passes ‘No Tax On Tips Act,’ Critics Worry It Will Cement ‘Outdated’ Tipping System

In an unexpected move, the Republican-led Senate unanimously passed the No Tax on Tips Act,…

1 day ago