Judge Cannon Revises Ruling Allowing DOJ’s Mar-a-Lago Probe To Proceed

An appeals court panel rejected Trump-nominated U.S. District Court Judge Aileen Cannon‘s ruling and allowed the Justice Department to move forward in its investigation into the classified documents recovered from Mar-a-Lago last month.

Cannon had placed a temporary hold on some of the classified documents, preventing the government from using around 100 of them in their criminal probe.

“Plaintiff has not even attempted to show that he has a need to know the information contained in the classified documents,” the panel wrote in their Wednesday opinion. “Nor has he established that the current administration has waived that requirement for these documents.”

Concern over national security was a hovering issue for the panel, which included an Obama-appointed judge and two Trump-appointed judges. They unanimously agreed that it was “self-evident” and in the public interest to allow the Justice Department to look into whether or not Trump mishandled White House documents.

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

The panel also responded to Cannon’s argument that allowing more eyes on the documents could create a larger opportunity for leaks.

“Permitting the United States to retain the documents does not suggest that they will be released; indeed, a purpose of the United States’s efforts in investigating the recovered classified documents is to limit unauthorized disclosure of the information they contain,” the decision read. “Not only that, but any authorized official who makes an improper disclosure risks her own criminal liability.”

Former President Donald Trump claimed that he was able to obtain the documents because he declassified the sensitive information, but earlier this week, the special master in the investigation said that Trump’s legal team failed to prove that the documents were declassified.

Trump’s lawyers argued that they plan to use the declassification argument if Trump is indicted and that they shouldn’t be required to outline their plan to provide evidence prematurely.

Rose Carter

Recent Posts

Biden Administration Proposes New Student Debt Relief Plan

President Joe Biden's administration announced new student loan plans that could provide aid to millions…

21 hours ago

Special Counsel Jack Smith Asks Supreme Court To Deny Trump’s Immunity Claim

In a new court filing, Special Counsel Jack Smith urged the Supreme Court to deny…

2 days ago

Biden Faces Challenges Getting On The Ohio & Alabama Ballots

According to a letter from Ohio's secretary of state, Frank LaRose, President Joe Biden may…

2 days ago

After Trump Says States Should Determine Abortion Laws, Democrats Try To Make Him Own The Issue

On Monday, Donald Trump said abortion laws should be determined by U.S. states, seemingly taking a more…

2 days ago

After Alabama Democrat Flips House Seat Amid IVF Controversy, Democrats Wonder If They Can Make A Comeback In The Reddest Of States

Last week, Democrat Marilyn Lands defeated Republican Teddy Powell in a special election for a state House seat in…

3 days ago

Who Is Nicole Shanahan, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s New V.P. Running Mate

Last week, independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced that San Francisco attorney and entrepreneur Nicole Shanahan would…

5 days ago