News

Judge Cannon Revises Ruling Allowing DOJ’s Mar-a-Lago Probe To Proceed

An appeals court panel rejected Trump-nominated U.S. District Court Judge Aileen Cannon‘s ruling and allowed the Justice Department to move forward in its investigation into the classified documents recovered from Mar-a-Lago last month.

Cannon had placed a temporary hold on some of the classified documents, preventing the government from using around 100 of them in their criminal probe.

“Plaintiff has not even attempted to show that he has a need to know the information contained in the classified documents,” the panel wrote in their Wednesday opinion. “Nor has he established that the current administration has waived that requirement for these documents.”

Concern over national security was a hovering issue for the panel, which included an Obama-appointed judge and two Trump-appointed judges. They unanimously agreed that it was “self-evident” and in the public interest to allow the Justice Department to look into whether or not Trump mishandled White House documents.

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

The panel also responded to Cannon’s argument that allowing more eyes on the documents could create a larger opportunity for leaks.

“Permitting the United States to retain the documents does not suggest that they will be released; indeed, a purpose of the United States’s efforts in investigating the recovered classified documents is to limit unauthorized disclosure of the information they contain,” the decision read. “Not only that, but any authorized official who makes an improper disclosure risks her own criminal liability.”

Former President Donald Trump claimed that he was able to obtain the documents because he declassified the sensitive information, but earlier this week, the special master in the investigation said that Trump’s legal team failed to prove that the documents were declassified.

Trump’s lawyers argued that they plan to use the declassification argument if Trump is indicted and that they shouldn’t be required to outline their plan to provide evidence prematurely.

Rose Carter

Share
Published by
Rose Carter

Recent Posts

Israel Approves Plan To Reoccupy Gaza Strip Indefinitely

On Monday, Israel’s cabinet approved a plan to reoccupy the Gaza Strip for an indefinite…

21 hours ago

Trump Administration Offers Undocumented Migrants $1000 To Self-Deport

On Monday, the Department of Homeland Security announced a new program offering undocumented immigrants a…

22 hours ago

Trump Says He ‘Doesn’t Know’ Whether He’s Obligated To Uphold The Constitution In Startling Interview

President Donald Trump raised eyebrows after answering he was unsure whether he is obligated to…

2 days ago

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi Slams Trump Plan To Reopen Alcatraz As ‘Unserious’

President Donald Trump has announced plans to reopen Alcatraz, the infamous maximum-security prison in San…

2 days ago

Trump Organization Is Selling $50 ‘Trump 2028’ Hats In Its Online Store

The Trump Organization is selling “Trump 2028” hats for $50 on its online store. “The…

3 days ago

DOGE Claims To Have Saved $160 Billion – But Its Cuts Will Cost Taxpayers $135 Billion, Report Finds

The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), headed up by tech billionaire Elon Musk, claims it…

3 days ago