News

Judge Cannon Revises Ruling Allowing DOJ’s Mar-a-Lago Probe To Proceed

An appeals court panel rejected Trump-nominated U.S. District Court Judge Aileen Cannon‘s ruling and allowed the Justice Department to move forward in its investigation into the classified documents recovered from Mar-a-Lago last month.

Cannon had placed a temporary hold on some of the classified documents, preventing the government from using around 100 of them in their criminal probe.

“Plaintiff has not even attempted to show that he has a need to know the information contained in the classified documents,” the panel wrote in their Wednesday opinion. “Nor has he established that the current administration has waived that requirement for these documents.”

Concern over national security was a hovering issue for the panel, which included an Obama-appointed judge and two Trump-appointed judges. They unanimously agreed that it was “self-evident” and in the public interest to allow the Justice Department to look into whether or not Trump mishandled White House documents.

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

The panel also responded to Cannon’s argument that allowing more eyes on the documents could create a larger opportunity for leaks.

“Permitting the United States to retain the documents does not suggest that they will be released; indeed, a purpose of the United States’s efforts in investigating the recovered classified documents is to limit unauthorized disclosure of the information they contain,” the decision read. “Not only that, but any authorized official who makes an improper disclosure risks her own criminal liability.”

Former President Donald Trump claimed that he was able to obtain the documents because he declassified the sensitive information, but earlier this week, the special master in the investigation said that Trump’s legal team failed to prove that the documents were declassified.

Trump’s lawyers argued that they plan to use the declassification argument if Trump is indicted and that they shouldn’t be required to outline their plan to provide evidence prematurely.

Rose Carter

Recent Posts

Minnesota Sen. Justin Eichorn, Who Wrote Bill To Make ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome’ An Illness, Charged With Soliciting Minor, Wife Files For Divorce

Minnesota state Sen. Justin Eichorn (R) has resigned from his position after he was federally…

17 hours ago

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick’s Promotion Of Tesla Stock On TV Raises Serious Ethics Concerns

Legal experts have claimed that Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick's promotion of Tesla stocks raises significant…

20 hours ago

GOP Rep. Andy Ogles Pushes Constitutional Amendment To Allow 3rd Term For Trump – But Not For Obama, Clinton Or Bush

Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tennessee) has proposed an amendment to the U.S. Constitution to allow presidents to serve…

2 days ago

Norwegian Oil Company Halts Supply To US Navy To Protest Trump’s Treatment Of Ukraine

Following the clash between President Donald Trump and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky at an Oval…

2 days ago

GOP Rep. Brandon Gill Introduces Bill To Require All $100 Bills Feature Donald Trump’s Face, Replacing Benjamin Franklin

Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) introduced the Golden Age Act of 2025, a bill that would require Donald Trump's face…

3 days ago

Vladimir Putin Gifted Donald Trump ‘A Beautiful Portrait’ Of Himself, Says He Prayed For President After Assassination Attempt

The Kremlin confirmed that Russian President Vladimir Putin gifted Donald Trump a portrait of himself, which Putin commissioned. Putin's spokesperson, Dmitry…

3 days ago