News

House Democrats Consider Censuring President Instead Of Impeaching

Some House Democrats have begun flirting with the idea of issuing a censure against President Donald Trump as a possible alternative to impeachment. A censure resolution is effectively a congressional slap on the wrist, a public statement by the House of Representatives that the president has acted in a manner that is wrong and unsuited to someone in the Oval Office.

As some House Democrats have ramped up their cries for the president’s impeachment, more moderate representatives have begun to look for a way to appease this impassioned faction without beginning an impeachment trial that will most likely end in disaster for the Democrats. To House leaders such as Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-California), a censure would allow her to throw a bone to the members of her party eager for blood and buy herself more time to find a way to keep control of her increasingly dissatisfied party.

Democrats have been calling for a presidential censure for years, beginning with the Congressional Black Caucus’ introduction of the measure after Trump’s 2017 defense of the white nationalists in Charlottesville, Virginia. More recently, Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tennesse), suggested the idea of censure in March of this year after the release of Robert S. Mueller III‘s report on Russian electoral interference. While Pelosi hasn’t actively supported the idea of censure, she has stated that  “Nothing is off the table.” While she has repeatedly made clear that, actually, impeachment is currently off the table, censure could be the next best thing for her.

However, some Democrats worry that censuring the president too early could also have negative effects similar to that of impeaching the president too early. Former-Rep. Steve Israel (D-New York) cautioned Democrats that censure may impact the legitimacy of the many investigations that House committees are currently conducting into the president, saying, “If you pass a censure resolution, I suppose an argument could be made that you no longer need these investigations because you’ve already censured the guy.” Furthermore, former-Rep. Earl Pomeroy (D-North Dakota) warned the House that censuring Trump “prematurely looks more like: ‘We really, really don’t like you.’ And a statement like that is really of no consequence.”

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

Daniel Knopf

Recent Posts

Federal Trade Commission Votes To Ban Noncompete Agreements

On Tuesday, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) banned noncompete agreements in a 3-2 vote. The…

2 days ago

California Bill Would Prevent CLEAR Passengers From Line-Jumping At Airports

A proposed bill in California would prohibit security screening company CLEAR from skipping the general…

3 days ago

Supreme Court Seems Receptive To Laws That Allow Restrictions On Homeless

On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments over a challenge to a law allowing…

4 days ago

Arizona Republicans Block Bill To Repeal Abortion Ban On State House Floor

The Arizona House of Representatives failed to advance a repeal of the state's 160-year-old abortion…

5 days ago

After Oregon Recriminalizes Drug Possession, What’s Next For The State’s Drug Policy

Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek (D) signed a bill restoring criminal charges in cases of hard drug possession.…

1 week ago

Biden’s New Regulation Will Limit Toxic Chemicals In Drinking Water Across The Country

President Joe Biden's administration announced the first-ever national limits on toxic "forever chemicals" in drinking water. This…

1 week ago