News

House Democrats Consider Censuring President Instead Of Impeaching

Some House Democrats have begun flirting with the idea of issuing a censure against President Donald Trump as a possible alternative to impeachment. A censure resolution is effectively a congressional slap on the wrist, a public statement by the House of Representatives that the president has acted in a manner that is wrong and unsuited to someone in the Oval Office.

As some House Democrats have ramped up their cries for the president’s impeachment, more moderate representatives have begun to look for a way to appease this impassioned faction without beginning an impeachment trial that will most likely end in disaster for the Democrats. To House leaders such as Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-California), a censure would allow her to throw a bone to the members of her party eager for blood and buy herself more time to find a way to keep control of her increasingly dissatisfied party.

Democrats have been calling for a presidential censure for years, beginning with the Congressional Black Caucus’ introduction of the measure after Trump’s 2017 defense of the white nationalists in Charlottesville, Virginia. More recently, Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tennesse), suggested the idea of censure in March of this year after the release of Robert S. Mueller III‘s report on Russian electoral interference. While Pelosi hasn’t actively supported the idea of censure, she has stated that  “Nothing is off the table.” While she has repeatedly made clear that, actually, impeachment is currently off the table, censure could be the next best thing for her.

However, some Democrats worry that censuring the president too early could also have negative effects similar to that of impeaching the president too early. Former-Rep. Steve Israel (D-New York) cautioned Democrats that censure may impact the legitimacy of the many investigations that House committees are currently conducting into the president, saying, “If you pass a censure resolution, I suppose an argument could be made that you no longer need these investigations because you’ve already censured the guy.” Furthermore, former-Rep. Earl Pomeroy (D-North Dakota) warned the House that censuring Trump “prematurely looks more like: ‘We really, really don’t like you.’ And a statement like that is really of no consequence.”

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

Daniel Knopf

Share
Published by
Daniel Knopf

Recent Posts

After Trump Threatens To Arrest California Gov. Gavin Newsom, Relationship Between Leaders Hits New Low

After President Donald Trump said last week that he supported arresting Gov. Gavin Newsom (D)…

11 hours ago

NYC Launches Rat Contraception Program To Combat Massive Citywide Rodent Problem

In an effort to curb New York City's rodent problem, city officials have launched a…

11 hours ago

Trump Demands ‘Unconditional Surrender’ From Iran As He Moves Toward U.S. Air Strikes

As the Israel-Iran conflict continues to escalate, President Donald Trump is considering whether or not…

16 hours ago

Supreme Court Affirms Tennessee’s Ban On Gender-Affirming Care For Transgender Youth In Major Setback For Trans Rights Movement

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court ruled on Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for transgender youth.…

17 hours ago

After Trump Defends Putin At G7, Russia Launches Massive Deadly Attack On Kyiv, Killing American Citizen

After President Donald Trump urged members of the G7 summit to bring Russia back into…

17 hours ago

Suspect In Shooting Of Minnesota Lawmakers Wore Creepy Silicone Mask

Vance Boelter, the main suspect in the shooting of Rep. Melissa Hortman (D-Minnesota) and her…

1 day ago