News

Fraud Statute Dating Back To The Civil War Could Send Trump To Prison

Last summer, Donald Trump was charged by Special Counsel Jack Smith for his role in the Capitol insurrection on January 6, 2021. The statute that he is charged with violating dates back to the Civil War Reconstruction era.

Smith charged Trump with violating three criminal statutes that he allegedly violated as a result of efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.

Trump’s legal team was expecting two of the statutes: conspiracy to defraud the government and obstruction of an official proceeding.

However, the third statute cited was from Section 241 of Title 18 of the U.S. Code, which makes it a crime for people to “conspire to injure, oppress, threaten or intimidate any person” in the “free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States.”

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

The modern application of the law indicates that the former president could not only be charged for disrupting the election but for actually rigging it himself. This has been precedented in 20th-century cases involving ballot box tampering and casting fake votes.

Congress approved the statute after the Civil War, hoping to grant federal agents the authority to go after Southern whites who engaged in terrorism to prevent African Americans from voting.

Various lower and upper court decisions over the years have held that, by perpetuating voter fraud conspiracies and attempting to strip Americans of their Constitutional right to select state and federal officials, the perpetrator has engaged in a criminal act punishable by jail.

Smith has been gathering evidence of Trump’s involvement in theories of election fraud and in the events of January 6 for years. He has acquired recordings of phone conversations between Trump and his allies, wherein the former president tried to bully officials into “finding” enough votes to beat President Joe Biden.

The federal election fraud case was scheduled to begin in March but that is on hold as the Supreme Court is set to decide a number of Trump’s appeals.

Ava Lombardi

Recent Posts

Federal Trade Commission Votes To Ban Noncompete Agreements

On Tuesday, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) banned noncompete agreements in a 3-2 vote. The…

1 day ago

California Bill Would Prevent CLEAR Passengers From Line-Jumping At Airports

A proposed bill in California would prohibit security screening company CLEAR from skipping the general…

2 days ago

Supreme Court Seems Receptive To Laws That Allow Restrictions On Homeless

On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments over a challenge to a law allowing…

3 days ago

Arizona Republicans Block Bill To Repeal Abortion Ban On State House Floor

The Arizona House of Representatives failed to advance a repeal of the state's 160-year-old abortion…

4 days ago

After Oregon Recriminalizes Drug Possession, What’s Next For The State’s Drug Policy

Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek (D) signed a bill restoring criminal charges in cases of hard drug possession.…

1 week ago

Biden’s New Regulation Will Limit Toxic Chemicals In Drinking Water Across The Country

President Joe Biden's administration announced the first-ever national limits on toxic "forever chemicals" in drinking water. This…

1 week ago