News

Federal Judge Blocks Key Element Of Biden Administration’s Immigration Policy

U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar blocked a rule that allows immigration authorities to deny asylum to migrants who arrive at the U.S.-Mexico border without applying online or seeking protection in another country first. This undercuts a key element of President Joe Biden’s new immigration plan.

In May, the Biden administration announced a set of immigration policies that would lift certain border restrictions and maintain others. Biden repealed Title 41, which allowed authorities to expel migrants at the border in an attempt to minimize the spread of Covid-19.

He also enacted Title 8, which allows the government to remove migrants who cannot legally establish themselves in the U.S., and ban them from the country for at least five years.

Tigar deemed the rule illegal due to its presumption that migrants are ineligible for asylum if they enter the country between legal border crossings, and rejected the Biden administration’s arguments that Title 8 provides emphasizes other avenues for people to come into the country.

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

A number of immigration rights groups have said that Title 8 violates laws protecting the right to asylum, regardless of how a migrant enters the country. The groups claimed that it forces migrants to seek protection in countries that may not have the resources or policies to take care of them.

“The promise of America is to serve as a beacon of freedom and hope, and the administration can and should do better to fulfill this promise, rather than perpetuate cruel and ineffective policies that betray it,” said American Civil Liberties Union attorney Katrina Eiland in a statement.

Tigar delayed his ruling from immediately taking effect to give the Biden administration time to appeal. The Justice Department did so, asserting that their immigration policies are lawful.

Biden’s policies were meant to appease both ends of the political spectrum, opening channels for migrants to enter the U.S. but still enforcing border protection rules.

As of June, the number of unlawful border crossings had decreased by more than 70%.

Ava Lombardi

Recent Posts

Federal Trade Commission Votes To Ban Noncompete Agreements

On Tuesday, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) banned noncompete agreements in a 3-2 vote. The…

20 hours ago

California Bill Would Prevent CLEAR Passengers From Line-Jumping At Airports

A proposed bill in California would prohibit security screening company CLEAR from skipping the general…

2 days ago

Supreme Court Seems Receptive To Laws That Allow Restrictions On Homeless

On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments over a challenge to a law allowing…

3 days ago

Arizona Republicans Block Bill To Repeal Abortion Ban On State House Floor

The Arizona House of Representatives failed to advance a repeal of the state's 160-year-old abortion…

4 days ago

After Oregon Recriminalizes Drug Possession, What’s Next For The State’s Drug Policy

Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek (D) signed a bill restoring criminal charges in cases of hard drug possession.…

1 week ago

Biden’s New Regulation Will Limit Toxic Chemicals In Drinking Water Across The Country

President Joe Biden's administration announced the first-ever national limits on toxic "forever chemicals" in drinking water. This…

1 week ago