News

Democratic Senators Offer Bill To Radically Change Composition Of Supreme Court

A bill that could entirely change the composition of the Supreme Court was introduced by a group of Democratic senators.

The bill places a focused lens on court ethics and its conservative supermajority.

The bill would appoint a new Supreme Court justice every two years. The justice would be able to attend hearings for every case for 18 years but would have to step back after that and only hear a “small number of constitutionally required cases.”

“The Supreme Court is facing a crisis of legitimacy that is exacerbated by radical decisions at odds with established legal precedent, ethical lapses of sitting justice and politicization of the confirmation process,” Sen. Cory Booker (D-New Jersey) said at a press conference. “This crisis has eroded faith and confidence in our nation’s highest court. Fundamental reform is necessary to address this crisis and restore trust in the institution.”

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

The bill was introduced by Sens. Booker, Sheldon Whitehouse (D-Rhode Island), Richard Blumenthal (D-Connecticut) and Alex Padilla (D-California).

It was co-sponsored by Sens. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), Jeff Merkley (D-Oregon), Peter Welch (D- Vermont) and Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii).

A push for the reform of the Supreme Court gained traction this year after it was disclosed that Justice Clarence Thomas was given thousands of dollars of gifts from conservative political donors.

A bill was advanced earlier this year by the Senate Judiciary Committee to require the Supreme Court to follow a code of ethics.

“An organized scheme by right-wing special interests to capture and control the Supreme Court, aided by gobs of billionaire dark money flowing through the confirmation process and judicial lobbying, has resulted in an unaccountable Court out of step with the American people,” Whitehouse said.

Some Republicans in Congress argue that Congress has no jurisdiction to pass the bill about the court without a constitutional amendment.

“I know this is a controversial view, but I’m willing to say it,” Alito told The Wall Street Journal. “No provision in the Constitution gives them the authority to regulate the Supreme Court – period.”

Americans’ trust in the Supreme Court has severely plummeted in recent years.

According to a Gallup poll, 41% of Americans approve of how the Supreme Court is doing its job and 58% disapprove.

Astrid Valdez

Recent Posts

Trump Furious At Biden’s Decision To Commute Death Row Inmates’ Sentences To Life In Prison

On Tuesday, President-elect Donald Trump blasted President Joe Biden for his decision to commute 37…

2 days ago

House Ethics Committee Report Says Ex-GOP Rep. Matt Gaetz Paid For Sex & Used Drugs While In Congress

A report from the House Ethics Committee revealed that former Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Florida) committed…

3 days ago

Ex-Rep. Liz Cheney Calls Trump ‘Cruel & Vindictive’ After GOP Panel Calls For Her To Be Investigated By FBI

A report released by House Republicans suggested that former Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyoming) should be…

4 days ago

After Biden Commutes Sentences Of 1,500 People, GOP Critics Call It A Ploy To Deflect From Pardon Of Son Hunter

Last week, President Joe Biden announced that he would pardon 39 people and commute the prison sentences…

5 days ago

GOP Rep. Chip Roy Rants Against His Own Party For Backing Debt-Raising Bill, Trump Calls For A Primary Opponent Against Him

Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) condemned his fellow Republican lawmakers during a rant on the House floor after…

6 days ago

VIDEO: Rep Mike Waltz Does 44 Pushups After Army’s 31-13 Loss Against Navy in Annual Football Match

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/_kYWlyzuiMk Rep. Mike Waltz did 44 pushups to honor a bet after the Army football…

7 days ago