News

Democratic Senators Offer Bill To Radically Change Composition Of Supreme Court

A bill that could entirely change the composition of the Supreme Court was introduced by a group of Democratic senators.

The bill places a focused lens on court ethics and its conservative supermajority.

The bill would appoint a new Supreme Court justice every two years. The justice would be able to attend hearings for every case for 18 years but would have to step back after that and only hear a “small number of constitutionally required cases.”

“The Supreme Court is facing a crisis of legitimacy that is exacerbated by radical decisions at odds with established legal precedent, ethical lapses of sitting justice and politicization of the confirmation process,” Sen. Cory Booker (D-New Jersey) said at a press conference. “This crisis has eroded faith and confidence in our nation’s highest court. Fundamental reform is necessary to address this crisis and restore trust in the institution.”

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

The bill was introduced by Sens. Booker, Sheldon Whitehouse (D-Rhode Island), Richard Blumenthal (D-Connecticut) and Alex Padilla (D-California).

It was co-sponsored by Sens. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), Jeff Merkley (D-Oregon), Peter Welch (D- Vermont) and Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii).

A push for the reform of the Supreme Court gained traction this year after it was disclosed that Justice Clarence Thomas was given thousands of dollars of gifts from conservative political donors.

A bill was advanced earlier this year by the Senate Judiciary Committee to require the Supreme Court to follow a code of ethics.

“An organized scheme by right-wing special interests to capture and control the Supreme Court, aided by gobs of billionaire dark money flowing through the confirmation process and judicial lobbying, has resulted in an unaccountable Court out of step with the American people,” Whitehouse said.

Some Republicans in Congress argue that Congress has no jurisdiction to pass the bill about the court without a constitutional amendment.

“I know this is a controversial view, but I’m willing to say it,” Alito told The Wall Street Journal. “No provision in the Constitution gives them the authority to regulate the Supreme Court – period.”

Americans’ trust in the Supreme Court has severely plummeted in recent years.

According to a Gallup poll, 41% of Americans approve of how the Supreme Court is doing its job and 58% disapprove.

Astrid Valdez

Share
Published by
Astrid Valdez

Recent Posts

Republicans Push Back On Trump’s Proposed 30% National Park Service Cuts

President Donald Trump has proposed a 30% budget cut to the National Park Service (NPS),…

4 hours ago

Judge Orders EPA To Continue Funding Environmental Justice Grants For Low-Income & Minority Communities Terminated By Trump Administration

A federal judge ruled that the $600 million in environmental justice grants terminated by the…

5 hours ago

Former Rep. Colin Allred Tries Again To Flip Texas Senate Seat – Control Of Senate Could Hang In The Balance

Last month, former Rep. Colin Allred (D-Texas) announced his run for Senate. Allred previously lost…

6 hours ago

Biden Says He Authorized All Pardon Decisions After Republicans Claim Many Were Issued Without His Knowledge

Former President Joe Biden said he had granted every pardon and commutation issued at the…

10 hours ago

Senate Confirms Trump Nominee To Head FAA, Bryan Bedford, Who Falsely Claimed To Have Commercial Pilot’s License On Resume

Bryan Bedford, President Donald Trump's nominee to head the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), was confirmed…

11 hours ago

Trump Orders Strict Rules To Discourage Clean Energy Projects In Nod House Conservatives

Following the recent passage of the “Big, Beautiful Bill,” President Donald Trump has instructed the…

1 day ago