WASHINGTON, DC JANUARY 16: Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts arrives to the Senate chamber for impeachment proceedings at the U.S. Capitol on January 16, 2020 in Washington, DC. On Thursday, the House impeachment managers will read the articles of impeachment against President Trump in the Senate chamber and the chief justice of the Supreme Court and every senator will be sworn in. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Advocates of transgender rights seeking to overturn a Tennessee law banning gender-affirming care for minors were not well received by Supreme Court conservatives on Wednesday.
The court was reviewing a lower court ruling to allow the state’s ban on hormone treatments and puberty blockers to remain in place.
Curiously, conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch had nothing to say during the two-and-a-half-hour session.
Opponents of the Tennessee law used arguments from Gorsuch’s ruling in Bostock vs. Clayton County, stating that denying adolescents medicine based on their sex amounted to discrimination and needed justification from state officials.
Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!
A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.
If Gorsuch sides with the three liberals, one more vote will be needed to support the plaintiffs.
The case is being closely watched after 26 states have passed laws restricting gender-affirming care in recent years.
Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh seemed to support the view that the Tennessee law does not discriminate based on sex because it bans males and females from receiving drug therapies intended to transition to a different gender.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett seemed like she was leaning to vote the law was a form of sex discrimination. Barrett also questioned whether the state was depriving parents of the right to oversee their children’s medical care.
The first openly transgender attorney to argue before the Supreme Court was the American Civil Liberties Union’s Chase Strangio, who said transitioning is tied to sex, therefore making the law discriminatory based on sex.
Matthew Rice, who represented Tennessee, said the law prohibits treatments based on their use, not on the sex of patients getting them.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson noted that this logic would also call into question many foundational equal protection cases.
Jackson and Roberts traded shots in the hearing, and the chief justice suggested that medical questions are too nuanced for courts to decide on.
Transgender rights became a central issue in the 2024 election.
Most major American medical associations support gender-affirming care for minors. Opponents of the care look to European countries that have rolled back some of their support for these procedures in places like the United Kingdom and Sweden.
In the U.S., more restrictions are expected as President-elect Donald Trump‘s administration is promising to reverse measures that have granted access to care for transgender people.
According to state records, Texas has failed to spend nearly $225 million in federal disaster…
Richard Grenell, a special presidential envoy and president of the Kennedy Center, has been vocal…
After President Donald Trump berated his supporters on social media over their ongoing interest in…
Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) Robert F. Kennedy Jr. fired his top two…
Texas State Sen. Angela Paxton (R-Texas), the wife of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, said…
President Donald Trump has been diagnosed with chronic venous insufficiency after persistent questions about his…