News

Congressional Black Caucus Calls For Reform Of Senate Judiciary’s ‘Jim Crow’ Blue Slip Policy

The Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) has pledged to oppose the Senate Judiciary Committee’s consideration of two judges over the “blue slip” policy, which has historically given senators the power to stop a lower-court nominee from their own state.

When a federal judicial nominee is being considered, a blue slip is given to both senators from the nominee’s home state. The senators are instructed to write down their opinion about the nominee and return the slip to the Judiciary Committee, which will factor the responses into its decision.

If one or both senators refuses to return the blue slip, the nominee is dropped from consideration. Though the chairman of the committee decides how much power the policy really exerts, it has previously halted the nomination of many lower-court hopefuls.

The rule is rooted in discriminatory ideology – it was used by segregationists to keep people of color out of federal positions and undermine the civil rights movement.

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

Rep. Steven Horsford (D-Nev) has called on Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Illinois) to institute several reforms before the caucus considers the nominations of Jerry Edwards Jr. to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, and Brandon Long to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. Both candidates were nominated by President Joe Biden in June.

Horsford requested that Durbin waive the blue slip policy for U.S. attorneys and marshals, mandate the return of blue slips from at least one home-state senator and require that senators who refuse to return the blue slip explain their decision to do so.

In a letter to Durbin, Horsford wrote that the blue slip is “a fundamentally undemocratic vestige of Jim Crow.”

“Decisions made by federal judges play a critical role in determining the scope of individual civil rights and liberties. Judges matter, and the opinion of a few can impact the lives of many,” Horsford continued.

Ava Lombardi

Recent Posts

Trump & Robert F. Kennedy’s Comments Spur New Debate Around Vaccines & Autism

President-elect Donald Trump and his Health and Human Services Secretary nominee, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.,…

6 hours ago

Trump Furious At Biden’s Decision To Commute Death Row Inmates’ Sentences To Life In Prison

On Tuesday, President-elect Donald Trump blasted President Joe Biden for his decision to commute 37…

3 days ago

House Ethics Committee Report Says Ex-GOP Rep. Matt Gaetz Paid For Sex & Used Drugs While In Congress

A report from the House Ethics Committee revealed that former Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Florida) committed…

4 days ago

Ex-Rep. Liz Cheney Calls Trump ‘Cruel & Vindictive’ After GOP Panel Calls For Her To Be Investigated By FBI

A report released by House Republicans suggested that former Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyoming) should be…

5 days ago

After Biden Commutes Sentences Of 1,500 People, GOP Critics Call It A Ploy To Deflect From Pardon Of Son Hunter

Last week, President Joe Biden announced that he would pardon 39 people and commute the prison sentences…

7 days ago

GOP Rep. Chip Roy Rants Against His Own Party For Backing Debt-Raising Bill, Trump Calls For A Primary Opponent Against Him

Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) condemned his fellow Republican lawmakers during a rant on the House floor after…

1 week ago