News

Congressional Black Caucus Calls For Reform Of Senate Judiciary’s ‘Jim Crow’ Blue Slip Policy

The Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) has pledged to oppose the Senate Judiciary Committee’s consideration of two judges over the “blue slip” policy, which has historically given senators the power to stop a lower-court nominee from their own state.

When a federal judicial nominee is being considered, a blue slip is given to both senators from the nominee’s home state. The senators are instructed to write down their opinion about the nominee and return the slip to the Judiciary Committee, which will factor the responses into its decision.

If one or both senators refuses to return the blue slip, the nominee is dropped from consideration. Though the chairman of the committee decides how much power the policy really exerts, it has previously halted the nomination of many lower-court hopefuls.

The rule is rooted in discriminatory ideology – it was used by segregationists to keep people of color out of federal positions and undermine the civil rights movement.

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of political news in your in-box.
We find the news you need to know, so you don't have to.

Rep. Steven Horsford (D-Nev) has called on Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Illinois) to institute several reforms before the caucus considers the nominations of Jerry Edwards Jr. to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, and Brandon Long to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. Both candidates were nominated by President Joe Biden in June.

Horsford requested that Durbin waive the blue slip policy for U.S. attorneys and marshals, mandate the return of blue slips from at least one home-state senator and require that senators who refuse to return the blue slip explain their decision to do so.

In a letter to Durbin, Horsford wrote that the blue slip is “a fundamentally undemocratic vestige of Jim Crow.”

“Decisions made by federal judges play a critical role in determining the scope of individual civil rights and liberties. Judges matter, and the opinion of a few can impact the lives of many,” Horsford continued.

Ava Lombardi

Share
Published by
Ava Lombardi

Recent Posts

After Ex-Biden Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre Leaves Democratic Party, Critics Say She Was Big Part Of The Problem

Karine Jean-Pierre, former White House press secretary during Joe Biden's term in office, announced that…

2 hours ago

New York Announces Plans To Build First Major Nuclear Power Plant In U.S. In Over 15 Years

Gov. Kathy Hochul (D-New York) announced plans to build a nuclear power plant in upstate…

4 hours ago

Elon Musk Calls GOP Budget Bill ‘Utterly Insane,’ ‘Will Destroy Millions Of Jobs In America’

Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a former top deputy for President Donald Trump, called the Republican…

4 hours ago

Supreme Court Allows States To Defund Planned Parenthood

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of South Carolina's decision to stop covering Planned Parenthood's…

1 day ago

Judge Blocks Trump Order Eliminating Union Bargaining For Federal Government Workers

A federal judge ruled on June 24 that the Trump administration cannot eliminate union bargaining…

1 day ago

Tulsa Mayor Monroe Nichols Announces $105M Fund To Address Legacy Of 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre, Avoids Talk Of ‘Reparations’

Earlier this month, Tulsa Mayor Monroe Nichols unveiled a $105 million city-backed plan aimed at…

1 day ago